The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures
Physiologically important pressures in the heart and aorta are currently assessed with invasive pressure catheters. The subharmonic signal from microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, however, may be exploited to estimate pressures non-invasively. The objective of this work was (i) to develop a stat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference item |
| Published: |
Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826291491630219264 |
|---|---|
| author | Nio, A Faraci, A Christensen-Jeffries, K Eckersley, R Monaghan, M Raymond, J Forsberg, F Lamata, P |
| author_facet | Nio, A Faraci, A Christensen-Jeffries, K Eckersley, R Monaghan, M Raymond, J Forsberg, F Lamata, P |
| author_sort | Nio, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Physiologically important pressures in the heart and aorta are currently assessed with invasive pressure catheters. The subharmonic signal from microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, however, may be exploited to estimate pressures non-invasively. The objective of this work was (i) to develop a static phantom from commercially-available components for easy replication across different laboratories, and (ii) to investigate the subharmonic response of the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco Spa, Milan, Italy) at physiological pressures within this phantom. A phantom capable of maintaining 0-200 mmHg static pressures was developed using a cell culture cassette with Luer connections. SonoVue was added (0.4 μL/mL) and radiofrequency data were recorded on the ULtrasound Advanced Open Platform (ULA-OP) from 3.5-100% scanner acoustic output levels (transmit frequency 5 MHz, 16-cycle pulse, pulse-inversion). Signal processing was performed to extract the mean subharmonic amplitude in a 1 MHz bandwidth (2-3 MHz). A single growth phase between 75-325 kPa peak-to-peak acoustic pressures was observed at ambient pressure (0 mmHg). Within this growth phase, SonoVue exhibited an increase in subharmonic amplitude from 0-75 mmHg hydrostatic pressure, a plateau between 75-125 mmHg, and a decrease from 125-200 mmHg. The maximum sensitivity of SonoVue to hydrostatic pressure up to 75 mmHg was observed at 152 kPa peak-to-peak acoustic pressure (0.13 dB/mmHg, r2=0.99). This increase in subharmonic signal could have arisen from compression-only behavior as predicted by the Marmottant model, and may have clinical applications in estimating diastolic pressures non-invasively. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:00:12Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:b0b58a5f-73e3-4795-b19a-7dfaad3f003c |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:00:12Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:b0b58a5f-73e3-4795-b19a-7dfaad3f003c2022-03-27T03:58:24ZThe subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressuresConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:b0b58a5f-73e3-4795-b19a-7dfaad3f003cSymplectic Elements at OxfordInstitute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers2017Nio, AFaraci, AChristensen-Jeffries, KEckersley, RMonaghan, MRaymond, JForsberg, FLamata, PPhysiologically important pressures in the heart and aorta are currently assessed with invasive pressure catheters. The subharmonic signal from microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, however, may be exploited to estimate pressures non-invasively. The objective of this work was (i) to develop a static phantom from commercially-available components for easy replication across different laboratories, and (ii) to investigate the subharmonic response of the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco Spa, Milan, Italy) at physiological pressures within this phantom. A phantom capable of maintaining 0-200 mmHg static pressures was developed using a cell culture cassette with Luer connections. SonoVue was added (0.4 μL/mL) and radiofrequency data were recorded on the ULtrasound Advanced Open Platform (ULA-OP) from 3.5-100% scanner acoustic output levels (transmit frequency 5 MHz, 16-cycle pulse, pulse-inversion). Signal processing was performed to extract the mean subharmonic amplitude in a 1 MHz bandwidth (2-3 MHz). A single growth phase between 75-325 kPa peak-to-peak acoustic pressures was observed at ambient pressure (0 mmHg). Within this growth phase, SonoVue exhibited an increase in subharmonic amplitude from 0-75 mmHg hydrostatic pressure, a plateau between 75-125 mmHg, and a decrease from 125-200 mmHg. The maximum sensitivity of SonoVue to hydrostatic pressure up to 75 mmHg was observed at 152 kPa peak-to-peak acoustic pressure (0.13 dB/mmHg, r2=0.99). This increase in subharmonic signal could have arisen from compression-only behavior as predicted by the Marmottant model, and may have clinical applications in estimating diastolic pressures non-invasively. |
| spellingShingle | Nio, A Faraci, A Christensen-Jeffries, K Eckersley, R Monaghan, M Raymond, J Forsberg, F Lamata, P The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title | The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title_full | The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title_fullStr | The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title_full_unstemmed | The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title_short | The subharmonic amplitude of SonoVue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| title_sort | subharmonic amplitude of sonovue increases with hydrostatic pressure at low incident acoustic pressures |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nioa thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT faracia thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT christensenjeffriesk thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT eckersleyr thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT monaghanm thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT raymondj thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT forsbergf thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT lamatap thesubharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT nioa subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT faracia subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT christensenjeffriesk subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT eckersleyr subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT monaghanm subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT raymondj subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT forsbergf subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures AT lamatap subharmonicamplitudeofsonovueincreaseswithhydrostaticpressureatlowincidentacousticpressures |