Political agency, election quality, and corruption

How does electoral manipulation affect elected officials’ willingness to satisfy their constituents? Although the literature has highlighted the role of elections as mechanisms of accountability, we do not know how elections whose integrity is compromised influence elected officials’ actions in offi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rueda, M, Ruiz Guarin, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press 2020
_version_ 1826291679709102080
author Rueda, M
Ruiz Guarin, N
author_facet Rueda, M
Ruiz Guarin, N
author_sort Rueda, M
collection OXFORD
description How does electoral manipulation affect elected officials’ willingness to satisfy their constituents? Although the literature has highlighted the role of elections as mechanisms of accountability, we do not know how elections whose integrity is compromised influence elected officials’ actions in office. We present a model of accountability that allows for electoral manipulation and derive three results: (i) rent extraction increases with the level of electoral manipulation, (ii) the value of holding office is positively related to rent extraction for high values of office, and (iii) electoral manipulation increases with the value of office. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design that exploits rules determining the sizes of polling stations in Colombia, we estimate a positive causal effect of vote buying on the likelihood of the election winner being sanctioned for violating the disciplinary code of public officials. Consistent with the theory, we find that higher values of office are not linked to fewer sanctions but are associated with more vote buying.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:03:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b198461a-ee78-4391-aeeb-192d1925a25d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:03:03Z
publishDate 2020
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b198461a-ee78-4391-aeeb-192d1925a25d2022-03-27T04:05:18ZPolitical agency, election quality, and corruptionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b198461a-ee78-4391-aeeb-192d1925a25dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordUniversity of Chicago Press2020Rueda, MRuiz Guarin, NHow does electoral manipulation affect elected officials’ willingness to satisfy their constituents? Although the literature has highlighted the role of elections as mechanisms of accountability, we do not know how elections whose integrity is compromised influence elected officials’ actions in office. We present a model of accountability that allows for electoral manipulation and derive three results: (i) rent extraction increases with the level of electoral manipulation, (ii) the value of holding office is positively related to rent extraction for high values of office, and (iii) electoral manipulation increases with the value of office. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design that exploits rules determining the sizes of polling stations in Colombia, we estimate a positive causal effect of vote buying on the likelihood of the election winner being sanctioned for violating the disciplinary code of public officials. Consistent with the theory, we find that higher values of office are not linked to fewer sanctions but are associated with more vote buying.
spellingShingle Rueda, M
Ruiz Guarin, N
Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title_full Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title_fullStr Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title_full_unstemmed Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title_short Political agency, election quality, and corruption
title_sort political agency election quality and corruption
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedam politicalagencyelectionqualityandcorruption
AT ruizguarinn politicalagencyelectionqualityandcorruption