A scoring system for the foot and ankle that is acceptable, reliable, valid and responsive
We read with interest the recent paper by Groarke et al. (Quality of life in individuals with chronic foot conditions: a cross sectional observational study. The Foot (2012) doi:10.1016/i.foot.2011.11.007). The paper ended by stating that 'there is no scoring system for the foot and ankle that...
Main Authors: | Dawson, J, Boller, I, Doll, H, Jenkinson, C, Lavis, G, Sharp, R, Cooke, P |
---|---|
格式: | Journal article |
语言: | English |
出版: |
2012
|
相似书籍
-
A scoring system for the foot and ankle that is acceptable, reliable, valid and responsive.
由: Dawson, J, et al.
出版: (2012) -
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS).
由: Dawson, J, et al.
出版: (2012) -
The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
由: Dawson, J, et al.
出版: (2011) -
Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery
由: Dawson, J, et al.
出版: (2014) -
Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery.
由: Dawson, J, et al.
出版: (2014)