Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting.
Background<br/> Obtaining prospective written consent from women to participate in trials when they are experiencing an obstetric emergency is challenging. Alternative consent pathways, such as gaining verbal consent at enrolment followed, later, by obtaining written consent, have been advocat...
Main Authors: | Lawton, J, Hallowell, N, Snowdon, C, Norman, J, Carruthers, K, Denison, F |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals
by: Hallowell, N, et al.
Published: (2016) -
The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty
by: Hallowell, N, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Patients acceptance and comprehension to written and verbal consent (PAC–VC)
by: Rabia Kashur, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
A randomized controlled trial of patient recall after detailed written consent versus standard verbal consent in adults with routine orthopaedic trauma
by: Amjad M. Aslam, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Consent-GPT: is it ethical to delegate procedural consent to conversational AI?
by: Allen, JW, et al.
Published: (2023)