Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations

The Ecosystem Services (ES) concept highlights the varied contributions the environment provides to humans and there are a wide range of methods/tools available to assess ES. However, in real-world decision contexts a single tool is rarely sufficient and methods must be combined to meet practitioner...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Dunford, R, Harrison, P, Smith, A, Dick, J, Barton, D, Martin-Lopez, B, Kelemen, E, Jacobs, S, Saarikoski, H, Turkelboom, F, Verheyden, W, Hauck, J, Antunes, P, Aszalós, R, Badea, O, Baró, F, Berry, P, Carvalho, L, Conte, G, Czúcz, B, Garcia Blanco, G, Howard, D, Giuca, R, Gomez-Baggethun, E, Grizetti, B, Izakovicova, Z, Kopperoinen, L, Langemeyer, J, Luque, S, Lapola, D, Martinez-Pastur, G, Mukhopadhyay, R, Roy, S, Niemelä, J, Norton, L, Ochieng, J, Odee, D, Palomo, I, Pinho, P, Priess, J, Rusch, G, Saarela, S, Santos, R, van der Wal, J, Vadineanu, A, Vári, Á, Woods, H, Yli-Pelkonen, V
Materyal Türü: Journal article
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Elsevier 2017
_version_ 1826291763228180480
author Dunford, R
Harrison, P
Smith, A
Dick, J
Barton, D
Martin-Lopez, B
Kelemen, E
Jacobs, S
Saarikoski, H
Turkelboom, F
Verheyden, W
Hauck, J
Antunes, P
Aszalós, R
Badea, O
Baró, F
Berry, P
Carvalho, L
Conte, G
Czúcz, B
Garcia Blanco, G
Howard, D
Giuca, R
Gomez-Baggethun, E
Grizetti, B
Izakovicova, Z
Kopperoinen, L
Langemeyer, J
Luque, S
Lapola, D
Martinez-Pastur, G
Mukhopadhyay, R
Roy, S
Niemelä, J
Norton, L
Ochieng, J
Odee, D
Palomo, I
Pinho, P
Priess, J
Rusch, G
Saarela, S
Santos, R
van der Wal, J
Vadineanu, A
Vári, Á
Woods, H
Yli-Pelkonen, V
author_facet Dunford, R
Harrison, P
Smith, A
Dick, J
Barton, D
Martin-Lopez, B
Kelemen, E
Jacobs, S
Saarikoski, H
Turkelboom, F
Verheyden, W
Hauck, J
Antunes, P
Aszalós, R
Badea, O
Baró, F
Berry, P
Carvalho, L
Conte, G
Czúcz, B
Garcia Blanco, G
Howard, D
Giuca, R
Gomez-Baggethun, E
Grizetti, B
Izakovicova, Z
Kopperoinen, L
Langemeyer, J
Luque, S
Lapola, D
Martinez-Pastur, G
Mukhopadhyay, R
Roy, S
Niemelä, J
Norton, L
Ochieng, J
Odee, D
Palomo, I
Pinho, P
Priess, J
Rusch, G
Saarela, S
Santos, R
van der Wal, J
Vadineanu, A
Vári, Á
Woods, H
Yli-Pelkonen, V
author_sort Dunford, R
collection OXFORD
description The Ecosystem Services (ES) concept highlights the varied contributions the environment provides to humans and there are a wide range of methods/tools available to assess ES. However, in real-world decision contexts a single tool is rarely sufficient and methods must be combined to meet practitioner needs. Here, results from the OpenNESS project are presented to illustrate the methods selected to meet the needs of 24 real-world case studies and better understand why and how methods are combined to meet practical needs. Results showed that within the cases methods were combined to: i) address a range of ES; ii) assess both supply and demand of ES; iii) assess a range of value types; iv) reach different stakeholder groups v) cover weaknesses in other methods used and vi) to meet specific decision context needs. Methods were linked in a variety of ways: i) as input–output chains of methods; ii) through learning; iii) through method development and iv) through comparison/triangulation of results. The paper synthesises these case study-based experiences to provide insight to others working in practical contexts as to where, and in what contexts, different methods can be combined and how this can add value to case study analyses.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:04:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b1fe142a-53a1-4d67-95fb-e5f90256f34a
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:04:20Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b1fe142a-53a1-4d67-95fb-e5f90256f34a2022-03-27T04:08:34ZIntegrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b1fe142a-53a1-4d67-95fb-e5f90256f34aSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2017Dunford, RHarrison, PSmith, ADick, JBarton, DMartin-Lopez, BKelemen, EJacobs, SSaarikoski, HTurkelboom, FVerheyden, WHauck, JAntunes, PAszalós, RBadea, OBaró, FBerry, PCarvalho, LConte, GCzúcz, BGarcia Blanco, GHoward, DGiuca, RGomez-Baggethun, EGrizetti, BIzakovicova, ZKopperoinen, LLangemeyer, JLuque, SLapola, DMartinez-Pastur, GMukhopadhyay, RRoy, SNiemelä, JNorton, LOchieng, JOdee, DPalomo, IPinho, PPriess, JRusch, GSaarela, SSantos, Rvan der Wal, JVadineanu, AVári, ÁWoods, HYli-Pelkonen, VThe Ecosystem Services (ES) concept highlights the varied contributions the environment provides to humans and there are a wide range of methods/tools available to assess ES. However, in real-world decision contexts a single tool is rarely sufficient and methods must be combined to meet practitioner needs. Here, results from the OpenNESS project are presented to illustrate the methods selected to meet the needs of 24 real-world case studies and better understand why and how methods are combined to meet practical needs. Results showed that within the cases methods were combined to: i) address a range of ES; ii) assess both supply and demand of ES; iii) assess a range of value types; iv) reach different stakeholder groups v) cover weaknesses in other methods used and vi) to meet specific decision context needs. Methods were linked in a variety of ways: i) as input–output chains of methods; ii) through learning; iii) through method development and iv) through comparison/triangulation of results. The paper synthesises these case study-based experiences to provide insight to others working in practical contexts as to where, and in what contexts, different methods can be combined and how this can add value to case study analyses.
spellingShingle Dunford, R
Harrison, P
Smith, A
Dick, J
Barton, D
Martin-Lopez, B
Kelemen, E
Jacobs, S
Saarikoski, H
Turkelboom, F
Verheyden, W
Hauck, J
Antunes, P
Aszalós, R
Badea, O
Baró, F
Berry, P
Carvalho, L
Conte, G
Czúcz, B
Garcia Blanco, G
Howard, D
Giuca, R
Gomez-Baggethun, E
Grizetti, B
Izakovicova, Z
Kopperoinen, L
Langemeyer, J
Luque, S
Lapola, D
Martinez-Pastur, G
Mukhopadhyay, R
Roy, S
Niemelä, J
Norton, L
Ochieng, J
Odee, D
Palomo, I
Pinho, P
Priess, J
Rusch, G
Saarela, S
Santos, R
van der Wal, J
Vadineanu, A
Vári, Á
Woods, H
Yli-Pelkonen, V
Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title_full Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title_fullStr Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title_full_unstemmed Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title_short Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations
title_sort integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment experiences from real world situations
work_keys_str_mv AT dunfordr integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT harrisonp integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT smitha integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT dickj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT bartond integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT martinlopezb integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT kelemene integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT jacobss integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT saarikoskih integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT turkelboomf integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT verheydenw integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT hauckj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT antunesp integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT aszalosr integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT badeao integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT barof integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT berryp integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT carvalhol integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT conteg integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT czuczb integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT garciablancog integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT howardd integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT giucar integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT gomezbaggethune integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT grizettib integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT izakovicovaz integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT kopperoinenl integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT langemeyerj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT luques integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT lapolad integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT martinezpasturg integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT mukhopadhyayr integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT roys integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT niemelaj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT nortonl integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT ochiengj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT odeed integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT palomoi integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT pinhop integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT priessj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT ruschg integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT saarelas integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT santosr integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT vanderwalj integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT vadineanua integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT varia integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT woodsh integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations
AT ylipelkonenv integratingmethodsforecosystemserviceassessmentexperiencesfromrealworldsituations