Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil

In this article I begin by comparing and contrasting our reading practice regarding acrostics with our practice regarding allusions and intertexts, looking in particular at the problematic notion of authorial intention; I suggest an approach that assumes that ancient learned readers were on the loo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robinson, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Fabrizio Serra editore 2019
_version_ 1797089479288160256
author Robinson, M
author_facet Robinson, M
author_sort Robinson, M
collection OXFORD
description In this article I begin by comparing and contrasting our reading practice regarding acrostics with our practice regarding allusions and intertexts, looking in particular at the problematic notion of authorial intention; I suggest an approach that assumes that ancient learned readers were on the look-out for acrostics, just as they were for allusions, and that they would test them for significance (as we imagine they did for allusions). I then apply this approach to the beginning and end of the Aeneid, and the beginning of the Metamorphoses, exploring how our reading of these well-studied passages changes if we pay attention to the acrostics and telestics that this process unearths. I note among other things how the presence of ilus, of arma and a man, and of a Horatian mus and a Vergilian erato can enrich our reading of the text. I close with an old and particularly controversial acrostic in Eclogue 4 (cacata) that presents a potential challenge to my approach.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:04:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b2178091-dec7-4e78-8c50-3baa1ade2a80
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:04:40Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Fabrizio Serra editore
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b2178091-dec7-4e78-8c50-3baa1ade2a802022-03-27T04:09:10ZArms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and VergilJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b2178091-dec7-4e78-8c50-3baa1ade2a80EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordFabrizio Serra editore2019Robinson, M In this article I begin by comparing and contrasting our reading practice regarding acrostics with our practice regarding allusions and intertexts, looking in particular at the problematic notion of authorial intention; I suggest an approach that assumes that ancient learned readers were on the look-out for acrostics, just as they were for allusions, and that they would test them for significance (as we imagine they did for allusions). I then apply this approach to the beginning and end of the Aeneid, and the beginning of the Metamorphoses, exploring how our reading of these well-studied passages changes if we pay attention to the acrostics and telestics that this process unearths. I note among other things how the presence of ilus, of arma and a man, and of a Horatian mus and a Vergilian erato can enrich our reading of the text. I close with an old and particularly controversial acrostic in Eclogue 4 (cacata) that presents a potential challenge to my approach.
spellingShingle Robinson, M
Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title_full Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title_fullStr Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title_full_unstemmed Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title_short Arms and a mouse: Approaching acrostics in Ovid and Vergil
title_sort arms and a mouse approaching acrostics in ovid and vergil
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonm armsandamouseapproachingacrosticsinovidandvergil