Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management
The uptake of research in marine fisheries management and policy making depends on how effectively fisheries managers, researchers and scientific advisers communicate the needs for evidence, and the results and policy implications of research. The MariFish network of the major European funders of ma...
Autori principali: | , |
---|---|
Natura: | Journal article |
Lingua: | English |
Pubblicazione: |
2010
|
_version_ | 1826291817879961600 |
---|---|
author | Holmes, J Lock, J |
author_facet | Holmes, J Lock, J |
author_sort | Holmes, J |
collection | OXFORD |
description | The uptake of research in marine fisheries management and policy making depends on how effectively fisheries managers, researchers and scientific advisers communicate the needs for evidence, and the results and policy implications of research. The MariFish network of the major European funders of marine fisheries has therefore undertaken a study of current practices relating to communication of research needs and results, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and consequently how two-way communications, and hence the effectiveness of generating evidence for marine fisheries policy making and management, can be improved. Conclusions and recommendations for 'good practice' include the importance of building good relationships and trust between researchers and fisheries managers, the need for fisheries ministries to have sufficient inhouse scientific capacity to act as 'intelligent customers', and the key role of interpreters of research whose skills and career paths need to be carefully developed. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:05:10Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:b23f062e-f41b-40f7-b8a3-2ce5910926df |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:05:10Z |
publishDate | 2010 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:b23f062e-f41b-40f7-b8a3-2ce5910926df2022-03-27T04:10:26ZGenerating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and managementJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b23f062e-f41b-40f7-b8a3-2ce5910926dfEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Holmes, JLock, JThe uptake of research in marine fisheries management and policy making depends on how effectively fisheries managers, researchers and scientific advisers communicate the needs for evidence, and the results and policy implications of research. The MariFish network of the major European funders of marine fisheries has therefore undertaken a study of current practices relating to communication of research needs and results, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and consequently how two-way communications, and hence the effectiveness of generating evidence for marine fisheries policy making and management, can be improved. Conclusions and recommendations for 'good practice' include the importance of building good relationships and trust between researchers and fisheries managers, the need for fisheries ministries to have sufficient inhouse scientific capacity to act as 'intelligent customers', and the key role of interpreters of research whose skills and career paths need to be carefully developed. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Holmes, J Lock, J Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title | Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title_full | Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title_fullStr | Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title_full_unstemmed | Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title_short | Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
title_sort | generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmesj generatingtheevidenceformarinefisheriespolicyandmanagement AT lockj generatingtheevidenceformarinefisheriespolicyandmanagement |