Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

We investigate the relationship between Ertel potential vorticity Q and Bernoulli potential B on orthobaric density surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), using the Southern Ocean State Estimate. Similar to the extratropical atmospheres of Earth and Mars, Q and B correlate in the ACC i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanley, GJ, Dowling, TE, Bradley, ME, Marshall, DP
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American Meteorological Society 2020
_version_ 1797089526014803968
author Stanley, GJ
Dowling, TE
Bradley, ME
Marshall, DP
author_facet Stanley, GJ
Dowling, TE
Bradley, ME
Marshall, DP
author_sort Stanley, GJ
collection OXFORD
description We investigate the relationship between Ertel potential vorticity Q and Bernoulli potential B on orthobaric density surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), using the Southern Ocean State Estimate. Similar to the extratropical atmospheres of Earth and Mars, Q and B correlate in the ACC in a function-like manner with modest scatter. Below the near-surface, the underlying function relating Q and B appears to be nearly linear. Nondimensionalizing its slope yields “Ma,” a “Mach” number for long Rossby waves, the ratio of the local flow speed to the intrinsic long Rossby wave speed. We empirically estimate the latter using established and novel techniques that yield qualitatively consistent results. Previous work related “Ma” to the degree of homogeneity of Q and to Arnol’d’s shear stability criteria. Estimates of “Ma” for the whole ACC are notably positive, implying inhomogeneous Q, on all circumpolar buoyancy surfaces studied. Upper layers generally exhibit “Ma” slightly less than unity, suggesting that shear instability may operate within these layers. Deep layers exhibit “Ma” greater than unity, implying stability. On surfaces shallower than 1000 m just north of the ACC, the Q versus B slope varies strongly on subannual and interannual time scales, but “Ma” hovers near unity. We also study spatial variability: the ACC is speckled with hundreds of small-scale features with “Ma” near unity, whereas away from the ACC “Ma” is more commonly negative or above unity, both corresponding to stability. Maps of the time-mean “Ma” show stable regions occupy most of the Southern Ocean, except for several topographically controlled hotspots where “Ma” is always near unity.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:05:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b2536421-2fc8-4cc7-be5d-367f04aea903
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:05:22Z
publishDate 2020
publisher American Meteorological Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b2536421-2fc8-4cc7-be5d-367f04aea9032022-03-27T04:10:53ZErtel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar CurrentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b2536421-2fc8-4cc7-be5d-367f04aea903EnglishSymplectic ElementsAmerican Meteorological Society2020Stanley, GJDowling, TEBradley, MEMarshall, DPWe investigate the relationship between Ertel potential vorticity Q and Bernoulli potential B on orthobaric density surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), using the Southern Ocean State Estimate. Similar to the extratropical atmospheres of Earth and Mars, Q and B correlate in the ACC in a function-like manner with modest scatter. Below the near-surface, the underlying function relating Q and B appears to be nearly linear. Nondimensionalizing its slope yields “Ma,” a “Mach” number for long Rossby waves, the ratio of the local flow speed to the intrinsic long Rossby wave speed. We empirically estimate the latter using established and novel techniques that yield qualitatively consistent results. Previous work related “Ma” to the degree of homogeneity of Q and to Arnol’d’s shear stability criteria. Estimates of “Ma” for the whole ACC are notably positive, implying inhomogeneous Q, on all circumpolar buoyancy surfaces studied. Upper layers generally exhibit “Ma” slightly less than unity, suggesting that shear instability may operate within these layers. Deep layers exhibit “Ma” greater than unity, implying stability. On surfaces shallower than 1000 m just north of the ACC, the Q versus B slope varies strongly on subannual and interannual time scales, but “Ma” hovers near unity. We also study spatial variability: the ACC is speckled with hundreds of small-scale features with “Ma” near unity, whereas away from the ACC “Ma” is more commonly negative or above unity, both corresponding to stability. Maps of the time-mean “Ma” show stable regions occupy most of the Southern Ocean, except for several topographically controlled hotspots where “Ma” is always near unity.
spellingShingle Stanley, GJ
Dowling, TE
Bradley, ME
Marshall, DP
Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title_full Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title_fullStr Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title_full_unstemmed Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title_short Ertel potential vorticity versus Bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
title_sort ertel potential vorticity versus bernoulli potential on approximately neutral surfaces in the antarctic circumpolar current
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleygj ertelpotentialvorticityversusbernoullipotentialonapproximatelyneutralsurfacesintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent
AT dowlingte ertelpotentialvorticityversusbernoullipotentialonapproximatelyneutralsurfacesintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent
AT bradleyme ertelpotentialvorticityversusbernoullipotentialonapproximatelyneutralsurfacesintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent
AT marshalldp ertelpotentialvorticityversusbernoullipotentialonapproximatelyneutralsurfacesintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent