Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) is often managed without routine laboratory monitoring in Africa; however, the effect of this approach is unknown. This trial investigated whether routine toxicity and efficacy monitoring of HIV-infected patients receiving ART had an important long-term e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mugyenyi, P, Walker, A, Hakim, J, Munderi, P, Gibb, D, Kityo, C, Reid, A, Grosskurth, H, Darbyshire, J, Ssali, F, Bray, D, Katabira, E, Babiker, A, Gilks, C, Kabuye, G, Nsibambi, D, Kasirye, R, Zalwango, E, Nakazibwe, M, Kikaire, B, Nassuna, G, Massa, R, Fadhiru, K
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797089561156780032
author Mugyenyi, P
Walker, A
Hakim, J
Munderi, P
Gibb, D
Kityo, C
Reid, A
Grosskurth, H
Darbyshire, J
Ssali, F
Bray, D
Katabira, E
Babiker, A
Gilks, C
Grosskurth, H
Munderi, P
Kabuye, G
Nsibambi, D
Kasirye, R
Zalwango, E
Nakazibwe, M
Kikaire, B
Nassuna, G
Massa, R
Fadhiru, K
author_facet Mugyenyi, P
Walker, A
Hakim, J
Munderi, P
Gibb, D
Kityo, C
Reid, A
Grosskurth, H
Darbyshire, J
Ssali, F
Bray, D
Katabira, E
Babiker, A
Gilks, C
Grosskurth, H
Munderi, P
Kabuye, G
Nsibambi, D
Kasirye, R
Zalwango, E
Nakazibwe, M
Kikaire, B
Nassuna, G
Massa, R
Fadhiru, K
author_sort Mugyenyi, P
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) is often managed without routine laboratory monitoring in Africa; however, the effect of this approach is unknown. This trial investigated whether routine toxicity and efficacy monitoring of HIV-infected patients receiving ART had an important long-term effect on clinical outcomes in Africa. METHODS: In this open, non-inferiority trial in three centres in Uganda and one in Zimbabwe, 3321 symptomatic, ART-naive, HIV-infected adults with CD4 counts less than 200 cells per microL starting ART were randomly assigned to laboratory and clinical monitoring (LCM; n=1659) or clinically driven monitoring (CDM; n=1662) by a computer-generated list. Haematology, biochemistry, and CD4-cell counts were done every 12 weeks. In the LCM group, results were available to clinicians; in the CDM group, results (apart from CD4-cell count) could be requested if clinically indicated and grade 4 toxicities were available. Participants switched to second-line ART after new or recurrent WHO stage 4 events in both groups, or CD4 count less than 100 cells per microL (LCM only). Co-primary endpoints were new WHO stage 4 HIV events or death, and serious adverse events. Non-inferiority was defined as the upper 95% confidence limit for the hazard ratio (HR) for new WHO stage 4 events or death being no greater than 1.18. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN13968779. FINDINGS: Two participants assigned to CDM and three to LCM were excluded from analyses. 5-year survival was 87% (95% CI 85-88) in the CDM group and 90% (88-91) in the LCM group, and 122 (7%) and 112 (7%) participants, respectively, were lost to follow-up over median 4.9 years' follow-up. 459 (28%) participants receiving CDM versus 356 (21%) LCM had a new WHO stage 4 event or died (6.94 [95% CI 6.33-7.60] vs 5.24 [4.72-5.81] per 100 person-years; absolute difference 1.70 per 100 person-years [0.87-2.54]; HR 1.31 [1.14-1.51]; p=0.0001). Differences in disease progression occurred from the third year on ART, whereas higher rates of switch to second-line treatment occurred in LCM from the second year. 283 (17%) participants receiving CDM versus 260 (16%) LCM had a new serious adverse event (HR 1.12 [0.94-1.32]; p=0.19), with anaemia the most common (76 vs 61 cases). INTERPRETATION: ART can be delivered safely without routine laboratory monitoring for toxic effects, but differences in disease progression suggest a role for monitoring of CD4-cell count from the second year of ART to guide the switch to second-line treatment. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, the UK Department for International Development, the Rockefeller Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Abbott Laboratories.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:05:48Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b278def3-4064-4627-a63c-7e8e9ffa62b6
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:05:48Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b278def3-4064-4627-a63c-7e8e9ffa62b62022-03-27T04:12:01ZRoutine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b278def3-4064-4627-a63c-7e8e9ffa62b6EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Mugyenyi, PWalker, AHakim, JMunderi, PGibb, DKityo, CReid, AGrosskurth, HDarbyshire, JSsali, FBray, DKatabira, EBabiker, AGilks, CGrosskurth, HMunderi, PKabuye, GNsibambi, DKasirye, RZalwango, ENakazibwe, MKikaire, BNassuna, GMassa, RFadhiru, KBACKGROUND: HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) is often managed without routine laboratory monitoring in Africa; however, the effect of this approach is unknown. This trial investigated whether routine toxicity and efficacy monitoring of HIV-infected patients receiving ART had an important long-term effect on clinical outcomes in Africa. METHODS: In this open, non-inferiority trial in three centres in Uganda and one in Zimbabwe, 3321 symptomatic, ART-naive, HIV-infected adults with CD4 counts less than 200 cells per microL starting ART were randomly assigned to laboratory and clinical monitoring (LCM; n=1659) or clinically driven monitoring (CDM; n=1662) by a computer-generated list. Haematology, biochemistry, and CD4-cell counts were done every 12 weeks. In the LCM group, results were available to clinicians; in the CDM group, results (apart from CD4-cell count) could be requested if clinically indicated and grade 4 toxicities were available. Participants switched to second-line ART after new or recurrent WHO stage 4 events in both groups, or CD4 count less than 100 cells per microL (LCM only). Co-primary endpoints were new WHO stage 4 HIV events or death, and serious adverse events. Non-inferiority was defined as the upper 95% confidence limit for the hazard ratio (HR) for new WHO stage 4 events or death being no greater than 1.18. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN13968779. FINDINGS: Two participants assigned to CDM and three to LCM were excluded from analyses. 5-year survival was 87% (95% CI 85-88) in the CDM group and 90% (88-91) in the LCM group, and 122 (7%) and 112 (7%) participants, respectively, were lost to follow-up over median 4.9 years' follow-up. 459 (28%) participants receiving CDM versus 356 (21%) LCM had a new WHO stage 4 event or died (6.94 [95% CI 6.33-7.60] vs 5.24 [4.72-5.81] per 100 person-years; absolute difference 1.70 per 100 person-years [0.87-2.54]; HR 1.31 [1.14-1.51]; p=0.0001). Differences in disease progression occurred from the third year on ART, whereas higher rates of switch to second-line treatment occurred in LCM from the second year. 283 (17%) participants receiving CDM versus 260 (16%) LCM had a new serious adverse event (HR 1.12 [0.94-1.32]; p=0.19), with anaemia the most common (76 vs 61 cases). INTERPRETATION: ART can be delivered safely without routine laboratory monitoring for toxic effects, but differences in disease progression suggest a role for monitoring of CD4-cell count from the second year of ART to guide the switch to second-line treatment. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, the UK Department for International Development, the Rockefeller Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Abbott Laboratories.
spellingShingle Mugyenyi, P
Walker, A
Hakim, J
Munderi, P
Gibb, D
Kityo, C
Reid, A
Grosskurth, H
Darbyshire, J
Ssali, F
Bray, D
Katabira, E
Babiker, A
Gilks, C
Grosskurth, H
Munderi, P
Kabuye, G
Nsibambi, D
Kasirye, R
Zalwango, E
Nakazibwe, M
Kikaire, B
Nassuna, G
Massa, R
Fadhiru, K
Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title_full Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title_fullStr Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title_full_unstemmed Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title_short Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa (DART): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
title_sort routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring of hiv antiretroviral therapy in africa dart a randomised non inferiority trial
work_keys_str_mv AT mugyenyip routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT walkera routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT hakimj routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT munderip routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT gibbd routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT kityoc routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT reida routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT grosskurthh routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT darbyshirej routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT ssalif routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT brayd routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT katabirae routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT babikera routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT gilksc routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT grosskurthh routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT munderip routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT kabuyeg routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT nsibambid routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT kasiryer routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT zalwangoe routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT nakazibwem routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT kikaireb routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT nassunag routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT massar routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial
AT fadhiruk routineversusclinicallydrivenlaboratorymonitoringofhivantiretroviraltherapyinafricadartarandomisednoninferioritytrial