The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools

This article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combin...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Fancourt, N
التنسيق: Journal article
منشور في: Taylor and Francis 2016
_version_ 1826291975200964608
author Fancourt, N
author_facet Fancourt, N
author_sort Fancourt, N
collection OXFORD
description This article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combining a theorisation of three levels of dialogue with both notions of classification and framing, and a distinction between the formal curriculum and the institutional curriculum. Research in ‘Flintmead’ and ‘Headley’ is then described: the former an elite Anglican private boarding school, the latter a secular non-selective state day school. The analysis shows how the schools build complex structures across the different dialogical levels, between and within the formal and institutional curriculum, with varying strengths of classification and framing. In particular, similar approaches to religious education sit alongside different discursive structures. The implications of the study for further comparison are discussed, and for understandings of religious dialogue.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:07:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f7
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:07:34Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f72022-03-27T04:16:23ZThe classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schoolsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f7Symplectic Elements at OxfordTaylor and Francis2016Fancourt, NThis article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combining a theorisation of three levels of dialogue with both notions of classification and framing, and a distinction between the formal curriculum and the institutional curriculum. Research in ‘Flintmead’ and ‘Headley’ is then described: the former an elite Anglican private boarding school, the latter a secular non-selective state day school. The analysis shows how the schools build complex structures across the different dialogical levels, between and within the formal and institutional curriculum, with varying strengths of classification and framing. In particular, similar approaches to religious education sit alongside different discursive structures. The implications of the study for further comparison are discussed, and for understandings of religious dialogue.
spellingShingle Fancourt, N
The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title_full The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title_fullStr The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title_full_unstemmed The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title_short The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
title_sort classification and framing of religious dialogues in two english schools
work_keys_str_mv AT fancourtn theclassificationandframingofreligiousdialoguesintwoenglishschools
AT fancourtn classificationandframingofreligiousdialoguesintwoenglishschools