The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools
This article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combin...
المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
منشور في: |
Taylor and Francis
2016
|
_version_ | 1826291975200964608 |
---|---|
author | Fancourt, N |
author_facet | Fancourt, N |
author_sort | Fancourt, N |
collection | OXFORD |
description | This article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combining a theorisation of three levels of dialogue with both notions of classification and framing, and a distinction between the formal curriculum and the institutional curriculum. Research in ‘Flintmead’ and ‘Headley’ is then described: the former an elite Anglican private boarding school, the latter a secular non-selective state day school. The analysis shows how the schools build complex structures across the different dialogical levels, between and within the formal and institutional curriculum, with varying strengths of classification and framing. In particular, similar approaches to religious education sit alongside different discursive structures. The implications of the study for further comparison are discussed, and for understandings of religious dialogue. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:07:34Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f7 |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:07:34Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor and Francis |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f72022-03-27T04:16:23ZThe classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schoolsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b3130042-0007-403c-b51a-4346401584f7Symplectic Elements at OxfordTaylor and Francis2016Fancourt, NThis article explores the place of discourse about religions in education by comparing two very different schools. It initially outlines some of the current debates around religious discourse, notably in dialogue. A theoretical frame for analysing religious discourse in schools is proposed, combining a theorisation of three levels of dialogue with both notions of classification and framing, and a distinction between the formal curriculum and the institutional curriculum. Research in ‘Flintmead’ and ‘Headley’ is then described: the former an elite Anglican private boarding school, the latter a secular non-selective state day school. The analysis shows how the schools build complex structures across the different dialogical levels, between and within the formal and institutional curriculum, with varying strengths of classification and framing. In particular, similar approaches to religious education sit alongside different discursive structures. The implications of the study for further comparison are discussed, and for understandings of religious dialogue. |
spellingShingle | Fancourt, N The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title | The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title_full | The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title_fullStr | The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title_full_unstemmed | The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title_short | The classification and framing of religious dialogues in two English schools |
title_sort | classification and framing of religious dialogues in two english schools |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fancourtn theclassificationandframingofreligiousdialoguesintwoenglishschools AT fancourtn classificationandframingofreligiousdialoguesintwoenglishschools |