Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness

Subscribing to a techno-utopian discourse replacing institutions and experts with “trust in code,” digital alternative currency Bitcoin is pitched as a “math-based money” governed by incorruptible code rather than human regulators. In three cases, which occurred between 2013 and 2015, we examine thi...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Vidan, G, Lehdonvirta, V
格式: Journal article
出版: SAGE Publications 2018
_version_ 1826292270390837248
author Vidan, G
Lehdonvirta, V
author_facet Vidan, G
Lehdonvirta, V
author_sort Vidan, G
collection OXFORD
description Subscribing to a techno-utopian discourse replacing institutions and experts with “trust in code,” digital alternative currency Bitcoin is pitched as a “math-based money” governed by incorruptible code rather than human regulators. In three cases, which occurred between 2013 and 2015, we examine this system at moments of breakdown. In contrast to the discourse, we find that power is concentrated to critical sites and individuals who manage the system through ad hoc negotiations, and who users must therefore implicitly trust—a contrast we call Bitcoin’s “promissory gap.” But even in the face of such contradictions between premise and reality, the discourse is maintained. We identify four authorizing strategies used in this work: conflating people with devices, assuming actors conform to notions of economic rationality, appealing to technical expertise, and explaining contradictions as temporary bugs. We contend that these strategies are mobilized widely to legitimize a variety of applications of algorithmic regulation and peer production projects.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b489489f-9426-46e1-b3ed-d3a4b60e6845
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:06Z
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b489489f-9426-46e1-b3ed-d3a4b60e68452022-03-27T04:26:54ZMine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessnessJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b489489f-9426-46e1-b3ed-d3a4b60e6845Symplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2018Vidan, GLehdonvirta, VSubscribing to a techno-utopian discourse replacing institutions and experts with “trust in code,” digital alternative currency Bitcoin is pitched as a “math-based money” governed by incorruptible code rather than human regulators. In three cases, which occurred between 2013 and 2015, we examine this system at moments of breakdown. In contrast to the discourse, we find that power is concentrated to critical sites and individuals who manage the system through ad hoc negotiations, and who users must therefore implicitly trust—a contrast we call Bitcoin’s “promissory gap.” But even in the face of such contradictions between premise and reality, the discourse is maintained. We identify four authorizing strategies used in this work: conflating people with devices, assuming actors conform to notions of economic rationality, appealing to technical expertise, and explaining contradictions as temporary bugs. We contend that these strategies are mobilized widely to legitimize a variety of applications of algorithmic regulation and peer production projects.
spellingShingle Vidan, G
Lehdonvirta, V
Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title_full Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title_fullStr Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title_full_unstemmed Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title_short Mine the gap: Bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
title_sort mine the gap bitcoin and the maintenance of trustlessness
work_keys_str_mv AT vidang minethegapbitcoinandthemaintenanceoftrustlessness
AT lehdonvirtav minethegapbitcoinandthemaintenanceoftrustlessness