God, elvish, and secondary creation

<p style="text-align:justify;">According to the theological worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, the principal work of a Christian is to know, love, and serve God. Why, then, did he devote so much time to creating an entire family of imaginary languages for imaginary peoples in an imagina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinsent, A
Format: Journal article
Published: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2019
_version_ 1797090004766294016
author Pinsent, A
author_facet Pinsent, A
author_sort Pinsent, A
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;">According to the theological worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, the principal work of a Christian is to know, love, and serve God. Why, then, did he devote so much time to creating an entire family of imaginary languages for imaginary peoples in an imaginary world? This paper argues that the stories of these peoples, with their ‘eucatastrophes,’ have consoling value amid the incomplete stories of our own lives. But more fundamentally, secondary creation is proper to the adopted children of God and can be a way of drawing closer to God. Such work also witnesses to the freedom of the children of God, not only to receive salvation from God, but to contribute to the enrichment of creation and eternal life.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:13Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b49664b6-a43b-4d74-8607-dee5b795f57d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:13Z
publishDate 2019
publisher European Journal for Philosophy of Religion
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b49664b6-a43b-4d74-8607-dee5b795f57d2022-03-27T04:27:10ZGod, elvish, and secondary creationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b49664b6-a43b-4d74-8607-dee5b795f57dSymplectic Elements at OxfordEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Religion2019Pinsent, A <p style="text-align:justify;">According to the theological worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, the principal work of a Christian is to know, love, and serve God. Why, then, did he devote so much time to creating an entire family of imaginary languages for imaginary peoples in an imaginary world? This paper argues that the stories of these peoples, with their ‘eucatastrophes,’ have consoling value amid the incomplete stories of our own lives. But more fundamentally, secondary creation is proper to the adopted children of God and can be a way of drawing closer to God. Such work also witnesses to the freedom of the children of God, not only to receive salvation from God, but to contribute to the enrichment of creation and eternal life.</p>
spellingShingle Pinsent, A
God, elvish, and secondary creation
title God, elvish, and secondary creation
title_full God, elvish, and secondary creation
title_fullStr God, elvish, and secondary creation
title_full_unstemmed God, elvish, and secondary creation
title_short God, elvish, and secondary creation
title_sort god elvish and secondary creation
work_keys_str_mv AT pinsenta godelvishandsecondarycreation