Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches

<p>While the public claim to be concerned about privacy, they rarely express protective behaviour. This disparity has been labelled the <em>Privacy Paradox</em>. The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is ubiquitous and data-collecting. It has therefore been considered a privacy risk. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Williams, M
Other Authors: Nurse, J
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
_version_ 1797090015148244992
author Williams, M
author2 Nurse, J
author_facet Nurse, J
Williams, M
author_sort Williams, M
collection OXFORD
description <p>While the public claim to be concerned about privacy, they rarely express protective behaviour. This disparity has been labelled the <em>Privacy Paradox</em>. The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is ubiquitous and data-collecting. It has therefore been considered a privacy risk. However, the Paradox has not been assessed in this context. Hence, we explored whether the issue could be mitigated in novel environments. Before analysing these devices, we began by confirming the Paradox's prevalence. This was undertaken through street surveys, which suggested that views had little relationship with behaviour. We continued by comparing user perceptions across a range of technologies. Through an online survey [n = 170], participants rated 'IoT' devices as most concerning. They were also considered less usable, potentially placing constraints on protection. To dissect the issue, we then conducted detailed interviews. Discussions were undertaken with 40 users, 20 of which had an IoT product. Protection was less common in the IoT, contributing to greater Paradox prevalence. Wearables were particularly prone, and therefore we scoped our focus to smartwatches. Through analysing participant rationale, a lack of awareness appeared the greatest IoT issue. Since educational games had proved effective in the literature, we developed privacy apps. Our online prototype was trialled by 504 smartwatch owners. In our treatment group, we found the Paradox was mitigated in posttest results. Therefore, for our final study, we implemented the first smartwatch privacy game. Through a two-month longitudinal study, we analysed empirical behaviour. Users were given an (Android) Wear OS watch, with half playing the game. Protection increased and persisted in this group, with the Paradox mitigated over an extended period. Our research has novelty, in that this has not been achieved in previous work. Furthermore, by analysing smartwatch behaviour, we provide novel insights into user rationale. As the IoT expands, it is crucial that individuals are informed to make privacy decisions.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:23Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:b4a1b178-34c8-49d2-bc80-0b4a23358959
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:23Z
publishDate 2018
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b4a1b178-34c8-49d2-bc80-0b4a233589592022-03-27T04:27:38ZExploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatchesThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:b4a1b178-34c8-49d2-bc80-0b4a23358959Human computer interactionComputer securityBehaviour changeEnglishORA Deposit2018Williams, MNurse, JCreese, S<p>While the public claim to be concerned about privacy, they rarely express protective behaviour. This disparity has been labelled the <em>Privacy Paradox</em>. The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is ubiquitous and data-collecting. It has therefore been considered a privacy risk. However, the Paradox has not been assessed in this context. Hence, we explored whether the issue could be mitigated in novel environments. Before analysing these devices, we began by confirming the Paradox's prevalence. This was undertaken through street surveys, which suggested that views had little relationship with behaviour. We continued by comparing user perceptions across a range of technologies. Through an online survey [n = 170], participants rated 'IoT' devices as most concerning. They were also considered less usable, potentially placing constraints on protection. To dissect the issue, we then conducted detailed interviews. Discussions were undertaken with 40 users, 20 of which had an IoT product. Protection was less common in the IoT, contributing to greater Paradox prevalence. Wearables were particularly prone, and therefore we scoped our focus to smartwatches. Through analysing participant rationale, a lack of awareness appeared the greatest IoT issue. Since educational games had proved effective in the literature, we developed privacy apps. Our online prototype was trialled by 504 smartwatch owners. In our treatment group, we found the Paradox was mitigated in posttest results. Therefore, for our final study, we implemented the first smartwatch privacy game. Through a two-month longitudinal study, we analysed empirical behaviour. Users were given an (Android) Wear OS watch, with half playing the game. Protection increased and persisted in this group, with the Paradox mitigated over an extended period. Our research has novelty, in that this has not been achieved in previous work. Furthermore, by analysing smartwatch behaviour, we provide novel insights into user rationale. As the IoT expands, it is crucial that individuals are informed to make privacy decisions.</p>
spellingShingle Human computer interaction
Computer security
Behaviour change
Williams, M
Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title_full Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title_fullStr Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title_short Exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the Privacy Paradox on smartwatches
title_sort exploring the influence of privacy awareness on the privacy paradox on smartwatches
topic Human computer interaction
Computer security
Behaviour change
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsm exploringtheinfluenceofprivacyawarenessontheprivacyparadoxonsmartwatches