The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection

The meteorite paleomagnetic record indicates that differentiated (and potentially, partially differentiated) planetesimals generated dynamo fields in the first 5-40 Myr after the formation of calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs). This early period of dynamo activity has been attributed to therma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dodds, K, Bryson, J, Neufeld, J, Harrison, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
_version_ 1797090017996177408
author Dodds, K
Bryson, J
Neufeld, J
Harrison, R
author_facet Dodds, K
Bryson, J
Neufeld, J
Harrison, R
author_sort Dodds, K
collection OXFORD
description The meteorite paleomagnetic record indicates that differentiated (and potentially, partially differentiated) planetesimals generated dynamo fields in the first 5-40 Myr after the formation of calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs). This early period of dynamo activity has been attributed to thermal convection in the liquid cores of these planetesimals during an early period of magma ocean convection. To better understand the controls on thermal dynamo generation in planetesimals, we have developed a 1D model of the thermal evolution of planetesimals from accretion through to the shutdown of convection in their silicate magma oceans for a variety of accretionary scenarios. The heat source of these bodies is the short-lived radiogenic isotope 26Al. During differentiation, 26Al partitions into the silicate portion of these bodies, causing their magma oceans to heat up and introducing stable thermal stratification to the top of their cores, which inhibits dynamo generation. In ‘instantaneously’ accreting bodies, this effect causes a delay on the order of > 10 Myr to whole core convection and dynamo generation while this stratification is eroded. However, gradual core formation in bodies that accrete over > 0.1 Myr can minimise the development of this stratification, allowing dynamo generation from ∼ 4 Myr after CAI formation. Our model also predicts partially differentiated planetesimals with a core and mantle overlain by a chondritic crust for accretion timescales > 1.2 Myr, although none of these bodies generate a thermal dynamo field. We compare our results from thousands of model runs to the meteorite paleomagnetic record to constrain the physical properties of their parent bodies.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b4a40a4e-28a0-48e2-91fe-b9b40f60caa0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:12:25Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b4a40a4e-28a0-48e2-91fe-b9b40f60caa02022-03-27T04:27:45ZThe thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convectionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b4a40a4e-28a0-48e2-91fe-b9b40f60caa0EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2021Dodds, KBryson, JNeufeld, JHarrison, RThe meteorite paleomagnetic record indicates that differentiated (and potentially, partially differentiated) planetesimals generated dynamo fields in the first 5-40 Myr after the formation of calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions (CAIs). This early period of dynamo activity has been attributed to thermal convection in the liquid cores of these planetesimals during an early period of magma ocean convection. To better understand the controls on thermal dynamo generation in planetesimals, we have developed a 1D model of the thermal evolution of planetesimals from accretion through to the shutdown of convection in their silicate magma oceans for a variety of accretionary scenarios. The heat source of these bodies is the short-lived radiogenic isotope 26Al. During differentiation, 26Al partitions into the silicate portion of these bodies, causing their magma oceans to heat up and introducing stable thermal stratification to the top of their cores, which inhibits dynamo generation. In ‘instantaneously’ accreting bodies, this effect causes a delay on the order of > 10 Myr to whole core convection and dynamo generation while this stratification is eroded. However, gradual core formation in bodies that accrete over > 0.1 Myr can minimise the development of this stratification, allowing dynamo generation from ∼ 4 Myr after CAI formation. Our model also predicts partially differentiated planetesimals with a core and mantle overlain by a chondritic crust for accretion timescales > 1.2 Myr, although none of these bodies generate a thermal dynamo field. We compare our results from thousands of model runs to the meteorite paleomagnetic record to constrain the physical properties of their parent bodies.
spellingShingle Dodds, K
Bryson, J
Neufeld, J
Harrison, R
The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title_full The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title_fullStr The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title_full_unstemmed The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title_short The thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation: consequences for dynamo generation by thermally-driven convection
title_sort thermal evolution of planetesimals during accretion and differentiation consequences for dynamo generation by thermally driven convection
work_keys_str_mv AT doddsk thethermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT brysonj thethermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT neufeldj thethermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT harrisonr thethermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT doddsk thermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT brysonj thermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT neufeldj thermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection
AT harrisonr thermalevolutionofplanetesimalsduringaccretionanddifferentiationconsequencesfordynamogenerationbythermallydrivenconvection