Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations
A growing number of news organisations have set up specific guidelines to govern how they use artificial intelligence (AI). This article analyses a set of 52 guidelines from publishers in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingd...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Internet publication |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SocArXiv
2023
|
| _version_ | 1797111414835380224 |
|---|---|
| author | Simon, FM Becker, KB Crum, C |
| author_facet | Simon, FM Becker, KB Crum, C |
| author_sort | Simon, FM |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | A growing number of news organisations have set up specific guidelines to govern how they use artificial intelligence (AI). This article analyses a set of 52 guidelines from publishers in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Looking at both formal and thematic characteristics, we provide comparative insights into how news outlets address both expectations and concerns when it comes to using AI in the news. Drawing from neoinstitutional theory and the concept of institutional isomorphism, we argue that the policies show signs of homogeneity, likely explained by isomorphic dynamics which arose as a response to the uncertainty created by the rise of generative AI after the release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Our study shows that publishers have already begun to converge in their guidelines on key points such as transparency and human supervision when dealing with AI-generated content. However, we argue that national and organisational idiosyncrasies continue to matter in shaping publishers’ practices, with both accounting for some of the variation seen in the data. We conclude by pointing out blind spots around technological dependency, sustainable AI, and inequalities in current AI guidelines and providing directions for further research. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:10:00Z |
| format | Internet publication |
| id | oxford-uuid:b527b298-a12b-4f0d-bf77-543e3375cdf7 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:10:00Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | SocArXiv |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:b527b298-a12b-4f0d-bf77-543e3375cdf72023-11-15T17:13:30ZPolicies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations Internet publicationhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7ad9uuid:b527b298-a12b-4f0d-bf77-543e3375cdf7EnglishSymplectic ElementsSocArXiv2023Simon, FMBecker, KBCrum, CA growing number of news organisations have set up specific guidelines to govern how they use artificial intelligence (AI). This article analyses a set of 52 guidelines from publishers in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Germany, India, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Looking at both formal and thematic characteristics, we provide comparative insights into how news outlets address both expectations and concerns when it comes to using AI in the news. Drawing from neoinstitutional theory and the concept of institutional isomorphism, we argue that the policies show signs of homogeneity, likely explained by isomorphic dynamics which arose as a response to the uncertainty created by the rise of generative AI after the release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Our study shows that publishers have already begun to converge in their guidelines on key points such as transparency and human supervision when dealing with AI-generated content. However, we argue that national and organisational idiosyncrasies continue to matter in shaping publishers’ practices, with both accounting for some of the variation seen in the data. We conclude by pointing out blind spots around technological dependency, sustainable AI, and inequalities in current AI guidelines and providing directions for further research. |
| spellingShingle | Simon, FM Becker, KB Crum, C Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title | Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title_full | Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title_fullStr | Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title_short | Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations |
| title_sort | policies in parallel a comparative study of journalistic ai policies in 52 global news organisations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT simonfm policiesinparallelacomparativestudyofjournalisticaipoliciesin52globalnewsorganisations AT beckerkb policiesinparallelacomparativestudyofjournalisticaipoliciesin52globalnewsorganisations AT crumc policiesinparallelacomparativestudyofjournalisticaipoliciesin52globalnewsorganisations |