Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives

Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a trending topic in athlete health care; however, little is known about its use in a sports context. This study aimed to measure knowledge and self-perceived practice of SDM among healthcare professionals working with athletes. This study evaluates SDM att...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelis, S, Dijkstra, HP, Damman, OC, Farooq, A, Verhagen, E
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024
_version_ 1811140166554746880
author Nelis, S
Dijkstra, HP
Damman, OC
Farooq, A
Verhagen, E
author_facet Nelis, S
Dijkstra, HP
Damman, OC
Farooq, A
Verhagen, E
author_sort Nelis, S
collection OXFORD
description Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a trending topic in athlete health care; however, little is known about its use in a sports context. This study aimed to measure knowledge and self-perceived practice of SDM among healthcare professionals working with athletes. This study evaluates SDM attitudes and preferences and explores how healthcare professionals perceive the factors influencing SDM. Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey with open-ended and closed-ended questions. Results: Our survey was completed by 131 healthcare professionals. The majority (63.6%) reported to prefer SDM and to be confident in their SDM skills (81.1%). Despite this inclination and confidence, only one in four clinicians reported consistent practice of SDM when feasible. Additionally, most clinicians lacked SDM knowledge. The barriers perceived by healthcare professionals included time constraints (17.6%), limited patient knowledge (17.6%), limited patient motivation (13.5%) and language barriers (16.2%). Importantly, two-thirds of the participants believed that SDM in athlete health care differs from SDM in non-athletes due to the high-pressure environment, the tension between performance and health, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests. Conclusions: Although healthcare professionals preferred SDM, they did not fully understand nor routinely practice it. Most healthcare professionals perceive SDM in athlete health care to differ from SDM in the general population. Therefore, to inform the implementation of SDM in athlete health care, future research is crucial to understand better what makes practising SDM unique in this setting.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:17:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b56b441a-61cc-4ba9-b53a-2ef28c3f4289
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:17:40Z
publishDate 2024
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b56b441a-61cc-4ba9-b53a-2ef28c3f42892024-07-20T15:48:55ZShared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectivesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b56b441a-61cc-4ba9-b53a-2ef28c3f4289EnglishJisc Publications RouterBMJ Publishing Group2024Nelis, SDijkstra, HPDamman, OCFarooq, AVerhagen, EObjectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a trending topic in athlete health care; however, little is known about its use in a sports context. This study aimed to measure knowledge and self-perceived practice of SDM among healthcare professionals working with athletes. This study evaluates SDM attitudes and preferences and explores how healthcare professionals perceive the factors influencing SDM. Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey with open-ended and closed-ended questions. Results: Our survey was completed by 131 healthcare professionals. The majority (63.6%) reported to prefer SDM and to be confident in their SDM skills (81.1%). Despite this inclination and confidence, only one in four clinicians reported consistent practice of SDM when feasible. Additionally, most clinicians lacked SDM knowledge. The barriers perceived by healthcare professionals included time constraints (17.6%), limited patient knowledge (17.6%), limited patient motivation (13.5%) and language barriers (16.2%). Importantly, two-thirds of the participants believed that SDM in athlete health care differs from SDM in non-athletes due to the high-pressure environment, the tension between performance and health, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests. Conclusions: Although healthcare professionals preferred SDM, they did not fully understand nor routinely practice it. Most healthcare professionals perceive SDM in athlete health care to differ from SDM in the general population. Therefore, to inform the implementation of SDM in athlete health care, future research is crucial to understand better what makes practising SDM unique in this setting.
spellingShingle Nelis, S
Dijkstra, HP
Damman, OC
Farooq, A
Verhagen, E
Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title_full Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title_fullStr Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title_short Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives
title_sort shared decision making with athletes a survey study of healthcare professionals perspectives
work_keys_str_mv AT neliss shareddecisionmakingwithathletesasurveystudyofhealthcareprofessionalsperspectives
AT dijkstrahp shareddecisionmakingwithathletesasurveystudyofhealthcareprofessionalsperspectives
AT dammanoc shareddecisionmakingwithathletesasurveystudyofhealthcareprofessionalsperspectives
AT farooqa shareddecisionmakingwithathletesasurveystudyofhealthcareprofessionalsperspectives
AT verhagene shareddecisionmakingwithathletesasurveystudyofhealthcareprofessionalsperspectives