Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review

Objective: To provide an overview of prediction models for risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. <br/>Design: Systematic review. <br/>Data sources: Medline and Embase until June 2013. <br/>Eligibility criteria for study selection: Studies describing the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Damen, J, Hooft, L, Schuit, E, Debray, T, Collins, G, Tzoulaki, I, Lassale, C, Siontis, G, Chiocchia, V, Cumming-Roberts, C, Maia Schlussel, M, Gerry, S, Black, J, Heus, P, van der Schouw, Y, Peelen, L, Moons, K
Format:	Journal article
Published:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016

Similar Items

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
by: Debray, T, et al.
Published: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
by: Heus, P, et al.
Published: (2019)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
by: Heus, P, et al.
Published: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
by: Heus, P, et al.
Published: (2020)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Johanna A. Damen, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Explicit inclusion of treatment in prognostic modelling was recommended in observational and randomised settings
by: Groenwold, R, et al.
Published: (2016)

Cardiovascular risk prediction models for women in the general population: A systematic review.
by: Sara J Baart, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
by: Riley, R, et al.
Published: (2019)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
by: Snell, KIE, et al.
Published: (2023)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
by: Pauline Heus, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Treatment use in prognostic model research: a systematic review of cardiovascular prognostic studies
by: Romin Pajouheshnia, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
by: Nguyen, T-L, et al.
Published: (2020)

External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
by: Riley, R, et al.
Published: (2016)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
by: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, et al.
Published: (2020)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2021)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2020)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2022)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2023)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2021)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2022)

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2023)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
by: Dhiman, P, et al.
Published: (2022)

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols
by: Kim van der Braak, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
by: Johanna A. A. G. Damen, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
by: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Published: (2022)

Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials-ESORT).
by: Odutayo, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal
by: Wynants, L, et al.
Published: (2020)

Prognostic value of positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Konstantinos C. Siontis, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

Systematic reviews on the prognostic role of biomarkers in heart failure
by: Vazquez-Montes, M, et al.
Published: (2018)

Continu werken aan continuïteit*
by: J. Peelen
Published: (1983-04-01)

Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable.
by: Kleinrouweler, C, et al.
Published: (2015)

Comparing risk prediction models.
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2012)

Comparing risk prediction models: Should be routine when deriving a new model for the same purpose
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2012)

Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models
by: Collins, G, et al.
Published: (2019)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
by: Debray, TPA, et al.
Published: (2023)

Development of the CORKA trial screening tool for identifying patients at increased risk of poor outcome following knee replacement
by: Schlussel, M, et al.
Published: (2017)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
by: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Intra-procedural anticoagulation protocols for left-sided cardiac ablations: Striking a balance between risk and benefit
by: Konstantinos C. Siontis
Published: (2016-11-01)

Novel Biomarkers to Improve the Prediction of Cardiovascular Event Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
by: Joep van der Leeuw, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)