Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models

Relations between task elements often follow hidden underlying structural forms such as periodicities or hierarchies, whose inferences fosters performance. However, transferring structural knowledge to novel environments requires flexible representations that are generalizable over particularities o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark, S, Moran, R, Parr, T, Kennerley, SW, Behrens, TEJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2020
_version_ 1826292690268979200
author Mark, S
Moran, R
Parr, T
Kennerley, SW
Behrens, TEJ
author_facet Mark, S
Moran, R
Parr, T
Kennerley, SW
Behrens, TEJ
author_sort Mark, S
collection OXFORD
description Relations between task elements often follow hidden underlying structural forms such as periodicities or hierarchies, whose inferences fosters performance. However, transferring structural knowledge to novel environments requires flexible representations that are generalizable over particularities of the current environment, such as its stimuli and size. We suggest that humans represent structural forms as abstract basis sets and that in novel tasks, the structural form is inferred and the relevant basis set is transferred. Using a computational model, we show that such representation allows inference of the underlying structural form, important task states, effective behavioural policies and the existence of unobserved state-trajectories. In two experiments, participants learned three abstract graphs during two successive days. We tested how structural knowledge acquired on Day-1 affected Day-2 performance. In line with our model, participants who had a correct structural prior were able to infer the existence of unobserved state-trajectories and appropriate behavioural policies.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:18:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b6abc8e7-1d79-4e51-956f-744e5ac0bde7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:18:35Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Nature
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b6abc8e7-1d79-4e51-956f-744e5ac0bde72022-03-27T04:42:34ZTransferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and modelsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b6abc8e7-1d79-4e51-956f-744e5ac0bde7EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer Nature2020Mark, SMoran, RParr, TKennerley, SWBehrens, TEJRelations between task elements often follow hidden underlying structural forms such as periodicities or hierarchies, whose inferences fosters performance. However, transferring structural knowledge to novel environments requires flexible representations that are generalizable over particularities of the current environment, such as its stimuli and size. We suggest that humans represent structural forms as abstract basis sets and that in novel tasks, the structural form is inferred and the relevant basis set is transferred. Using a computational model, we show that such representation allows inference of the underlying structural form, important task states, effective behavioural policies and the existence of unobserved state-trajectories. In two experiments, participants learned three abstract graphs during two successive days. We tested how structural knowledge acquired on Day-1 affected Day-2 performance. In line with our model, participants who had a correct structural prior were able to infer the existence of unobserved state-trajectories and appropriate behavioural policies.
spellingShingle Mark, S
Moran, R
Parr, T
Kennerley, SW
Behrens, TEJ
Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title_full Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title_fullStr Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title_full_unstemmed Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title_short Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
title_sort transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models
work_keys_str_mv AT marks transferringstructuralknowledgeacrosscognitivemapsinhumansandmodels
AT moranr transferringstructuralknowledgeacrosscognitivemapsinhumansandmodels
AT parrt transferringstructuralknowledgeacrosscognitivemapsinhumansandmodels
AT kennerleysw transferringstructuralknowledgeacrosscognitivemapsinhumansandmodels
AT behrenstej transferringstructuralknowledgeacrosscognitivemapsinhumansandmodels