Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid

How trustworthy are peer reviews by applicant-nominated assessors (ANAs)? For Australian Research Council (ARC) proposals (N = 2,330) with at least one ANA and one assessor nominated by the funding panel (PNAs), ANAs gave substantially higher ratings in all nine discipline panels (covering sciences,...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Marsh, H, Bonds, N, Jayasinghe, U
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: 2007

Схожі ресурси