An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units

Over a decade ago, bibliometric analysis predicted the disappearance of UK publishing in anaesthesia by 2020. We repeated this analysis to assess if this had turned out to be the case, searching PubMed for papers associated with UK consultant anaesthetists for 2017-2019 across 15 journals. Although...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ratnayake, G, El-Boghdadly, K, Pandit, JJ
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
_version_ 1797090654465032192
author Ratnayake, G
El-Boghdadly, K
Pandit, JJ
author_facet Ratnayake, G
El-Boghdadly, K
Pandit, JJ
author_sort Ratnayake, G
collection OXFORD
description Over a decade ago, bibliometric analysis predicted the disappearance of UK publishing in anaesthesia by 2020. We repeated this analysis to assess if this had turned out to be the case, searching PubMed for papers associated with UK consultant anaesthetists for 2017-2019 across 15 journals. Although the rate of decline has flattened using the same search filter, including a wider range of publication types shows that outputs still remain at half 1990s levels (381 papers for all 3 years combined), authored by 769 anaesthetists, 274 of whom are associated with an academic centre. There are now 11 identifiable academic units, and a further 15 places where anaesthetists have affiliations with academic centres as individuals. The majority of papers (71%) are in secondary analysis (observational, database and association studies, surveys and meta-analyses), rather than in primary research (clinical trials or laboratory studies). These data reflect the current academic capacity in terms of publications, academic units and staffing. We discuss how this information can be used to inform a new strategy for UK academic anaesthesia.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:21:47Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b7ac1c47-55a3-46de-ae9f-948b0d61aff9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:21:47Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b7ac1c47-55a3-46de-ae9f-948b0d61aff92022-03-27T04:50:23ZAn analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic unitsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b7ac1c47-55a3-46de-ae9f-948b0d61aff9EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2020Ratnayake, GEl-Boghdadly, KPandit, JJOver a decade ago, bibliometric analysis predicted the disappearance of UK publishing in anaesthesia by 2020. We repeated this analysis to assess if this had turned out to be the case, searching PubMed for papers associated with UK consultant anaesthetists for 2017-2019 across 15 journals. Although the rate of decline has flattened using the same search filter, including a wider range of publication types shows that outputs still remain at half 1990s levels (381 papers for all 3 years combined), authored by 769 anaesthetists, 274 of whom are associated with an academic centre. There are now 11 identifiable academic units, and a further 15 places where anaesthetists have affiliations with academic centres as individuals. The majority of papers (71%) are in secondary analysis (observational, database and association studies, surveys and meta-analyses), rather than in primary research (clinical trials or laboratory studies). These data reflect the current academic capacity in terms of publications, academic units and staffing. We discuss how this information can be used to inform a new strategy for UK academic anaesthesia.
spellingShingle Ratnayake, G
El-Boghdadly, K
Pandit, JJ
An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title_full An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title_fullStr An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title_short An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units
title_sort analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the uk by publication trends and academic units
work_keys_str_mv AT ratnayakeg ananalysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits
AT elboghdadlyk ananalysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits
AT panditjj ananalysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits
AT ratnayakeg analysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits
AT elboghdadlyk analysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits
AT panditjj analysisoftheacademiccapacityofanaesthesiaintheukbypublicationtrendsandacademicunits