Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene
The mechanics of speciation with gene flow are still unclear. Disparity among genes in population differentiation (F ST) between diverging species is often interpreted as evidence for semipermeable species boundaries, with selection preventing "key" genes from introgressing despite ongoing...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1797090693588451328 |
|---|---|
| author | Muir, G Dixon, C Harper, A Filatov, D |
| author_facet | Muir, G Dixon, C Harper, A Filatov, D |
| author_sort | Muir, G |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The mechanics of speciation with gene flow are still unclear. Disparity among genes in population differentiation (F ST) between diverging species is often interpreted as evidence for semipermeable species boundaries, with selection preventing "key" genes from introgressing despite ongoing gene flow. However, F ST can remain high before it reaches equilibrium between the lineage sorting of species divergence and the homogenizing effects of gene flow (via secondary contact). Thus, when interpreting F ST, the dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection need to be taken into account. We illustrate this view with a multigenic analyses of gene flow and selection in three closely related Silene species, S. latifolia, S. dioica, and S. diclinis. We report that although S. diclinis appears to have evolved in allopatry, isolation with (bidirectional) gene flow between S. latifolia and S. dioica is likely, perhaps as a result of parapatric speciation followed by more extensive sympatry. Interestingly, we detected the signatures of apparently independent instances of positive selection at the same locus in S. latifolia and S. dioica. Despite gene flow between the species, the adaptive alleles have not crossed the species boundary, suggesting that this gene has independently undergone species-specific (diversifying or parallel) selection. © 2012 The Author(s). Evolution © 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:22:21Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:b7d9d34f-25df-4750-9514-81677b0b25ec |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:22:21Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:b7d9d34f-25df-4750-9514-81677b0b25ec2022-03-27T04:51:36ZDynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in sileneJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b7d9d34f-25df-4750-9514-81677b0b25ecEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Muir, GDixon, CHarper, AFilatov, DThe mechanics of speciation with gene flow are still unclear. Disparity among genes in population differentiation (F ST) between diverging species is often interpreted as evidence for semipermeable species boundaries, with selection preventing "key" genes from introgressing despite ongoing gene flow. However, F ST can remain high before it reaches equilibrium between the lineage sorting of species divergence and the homogenizing effects of gene flow (via secondary contact). Thus, when interpreting F ST, the dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection need to be taken into account. We illustrate this view with a multigenic analyses of gene flow and selection in three closely related Silene species, S. latifolia, S. dioica, and S. diclinis. We report that although S. diclinis appears to have evolved in allopatry, isolation with (bidirectional) gene flow between S. latifolia and S. dioica is likely, perhaps as a result of parapatric speciation followed by more extensive sympatry. Interestingly, we detected the signatures of apparently independent instances of positive selection at the same locus in S. latifolia and S. dioica. Despite gene flow between the species, the adaptive alleles have not crossed the species boundary, suggesting that this gene has independently undergone species-specific (diversifying or parallel) selection. © 2012 The Author(s). Evolution © 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution. |
| spellingShingle | Muir, G Dixon, C Harper, A Filatov, D Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title | Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title_full | Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title_fullStr | Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title_short | Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in silene |
| title_sort | dynamics of drift gene flow and selection during speciation in silene |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT muirg dynamicsofdriftgeneflowandselectionduringspeciationinsilene AT dixonc dynamicsofdriftgeneflowandselectionduringspeciationinsilene AT harpera dynamicsofdriftgeneflowandselectionduringspeciationinsilene AT filatovd dynamicsofdriftgeneflowandselectionduringspeciationinsilene |