Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions

The paper begins by noting the widespread disagreement that has existed in philosophy from its very inception until now. It is claimed that Henry Sidgwick was right to see the main debate in ethics as between egoists, consequentialists, and deontologists. This raises the question whether the best ap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crisp, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020
_version_ 1826292940927926272
author Crisp, R
author_facet Crisp, R
author_sort Crisp, R
collection OXFORD
description The paper begins by noting the widespread disagreement that has existed in philosophy from its very inception until now. It is claimed that Henry Sidgwick was right to see the main debate in ethics as between egoists, consequentialists, and deontologists. This raises the question whether the best approach might be to seek a position based on the different theories rather than one alone. Some clarification is then offered of the main questions asked in ethics, and it is claimed that the primary ethical question is that of Socrates: how should one live? Substantive agreement between our three normative theories is possible, but unlikely; and explanatory agreement is conceptually impossible. More restricted agreement may be possible, though doubts can be raised about Derek Parfit’s ‘triple theory’. One might attempt to combine different elements of the theories, syncretically, but again agreement is unlikely. The paper ends by considering the epistemic implications of disagreement, and with a recommendation of a more eirenic methodology for moral philosophy.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:22:26Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b7e15533-cc76-4f78-9c66-8af870a58094
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:22:26Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b7e15533-cc76-4f78-9c66-8af870a580942022-03-27T04:51:56ZAre we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b7e15533-cc76-4f78-9c66-8af870a58094EnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer2020Crisp, RThe paper begins by noting the widespread disagreement that has existed in philosophy from its very inception until now. It is claimed that Henry Sidgwick was right to see the main debate in ethics as between egoists, consequentialists, and deontologists. This raises the question whether the best approach might be to seek a position based on the different theories rather than one alone. Some clarification is then offered of the main questions asked in ethics, and it is claimed that the primary ethical question is that of Socrates: how should one live? Substantive agreement between our three normative theories is possible, but unlikely; and explanatory agreement is conceptually impossible. More restricted agreement may be possible, though doubts can be raised about Derek Parfit’s ‘triple theory’. One might attempt to combine different elements of the theories, syncretically, but again agreement is unlikely. The paper ends by considering the epistemic implications of disagreement, and with a recommendation of a more eirenic methodology for moral philosophy.
spellingShingle Crisp, R
Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title_full Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title_fullStr Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title_full_unstemmed Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title_short Are we climbing the same mountain? Moral theories, moral concepts, moral questions
title_sort are we climbing the same mountain moral theories moral concepts moral questions
work_keys_str_mv AT crispr areweclimbingthesamemountainmoraltheoriesmoralconceptsmoralquestions