CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement
Background<br/> Population-based serologic studies are a vital tool for understanding the epidemiology of influenza and other respiratory viruses, including the early assessment of the transmissibility and severity of the 2009 influenza pandemic, and MERS-CoV. However, interpretation of the re...
| Asıl Yazarlar: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Journal article |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Wiley
2016
|
| _version_ | 1826292964882644992 |
|---|---|
| author | Horby, P Laurie, K Cowling, B Engelhardt, O Sturm-Ramirez, K Sanchez, J Katz, J Uyeki, T Wood, J van Kerkhove, M Committee, C |
| author_facet | Horby, P Laurie, K Cowling, B Engelhardt, O Sturm-Ramirez, K Sanchez, J Katz, J Uyeki, T Wood, J van Kerkhove, M Committee, C |
| author_sort | Horby, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Background<br/> Population-based serologic studies are a vital tool for understanding the epidemiology of influenza and other respiratory viruses, including the early assessment of the transmissibility and severity of the 2009 influenza pandemic, and MERS-CoV. However, interpretation of the results of serologic studies have been hampered by the diversity of approaches and the lack of standardized methods and reporting. <br/>Objective<br/> The objective of the CONSISE ROSES-I statement is to improve the quality and transparency of reporting of influenza seroepidemiologic studies and facilitate assessment of the validity and generalizability of published results. <br/>Methods<br/> The ROSESI statement was developed as an expert consensus of the CONSISE epidemiology and laboratory working groups. The recommendations are presented in the familiar format of a reporting guideline. Since seroepidemiologic studies are a specific type of observational epidemiology study, the ROSESI statement is built upon the STROBE guidelines. As such the ROSESI statement should be seen as an extension of the STROBE guidelines. <br/>Results<br/> The ROSES-I statement presents 42 items that can be used as a checklist of the information that should be included in the results of published seroepidemiologic studies, and which can also serve as a guide to the items that need to be considered during study design and implementation. <br/>Conclusions<br/> We hope that the ROSES-I Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of seroepidemiologic studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:22:49Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:b801e0d9-3ff9-4f0c-b4af-096335c52503 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:22:49Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:b801e0d9-3ff9-4f0c-b4af-096335c525032022-03-27T04:52:55ZCONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statementJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b801e0d9-3ff9-4f0c-b4af-096335c52503Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Horby, PLaurie, KCowling, BEngelhardt, OSturm-Ramirez, KSanchez, JKatz, JUyeki, TWood, Jvan Kerkhove, MCommittee, CBackground<br/> Population-based serologic studies are a vital tool for understanding the epidemiology of influenza and other respiratory viruses, including the early assessment of the transmissibility and severity of the 2009 influenza pandemic, and MERS-CoV. However, interpretation of the results of serologic studies have been hampered by the diversity of approaches and the lack of standardized methods and reporting. <br/>Objective<br/> The objective of the CONSISE ROSES-I statement is to improve the quality and transparency of reporting of influenza seroepidemiologic studies and facilitate assessment of the validity and generalizability of published results. <br/>Methods<br/> The ROSESI statement was developed as an expert consensus of the CONSISE epidemiology and laboratory working groups. The recommendations are presented in the familiar format of a reporting guideline. Since seroepidemiologic studies are a specific type of observational epidemiology study, the ROSESI statement is built upon the STROBE guidelines. As such the ROSESI statement should be seen as an extension of the STROBE guidelines. <br/>Results<br/> The ROSES-I statement presents 42 items that can be used as a checklist of the information that should be included in the results of published seroepidemiologic studies, and which can also serve as a guide to the items that need to be considered during study design and implementation. <br/>Conclusions<br/> We hope that the ROSES-I Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of seroepidemiologic studies. |
| spellingShingle | Horby, P Laurie, K Cowling, B Engelhardt, O Sturm-Ramirez, K Sanchez, J Katz, J Uyeki, T Wood, J van Kerkhove, M Committee, C CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title | CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title_full | CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title_fullStr | CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title_full_unstemmed | CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title_short | CONSISE statement on the Reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for Influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement |
| title_sort | consise statement on the reporting of seroepidemiologic studies for influenza roses i statement an extension of the strobe statement |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT horbyp consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT lauriek consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT cowlingb consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT engelhardto consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT sturmramirezk consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT sanchezj consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT katzj consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT uyekit consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT woodj consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT vankerkhovem consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement AT committeec consisestatementonthereportingofseroepidemiologicstudiesforinfluenzarosesistatementanextensionofthestrobestatement |