Enhancing court capacity to enforce education rights: judicial tools used in Abbott v. Burke
<p>This policy brief examines a critical aspect of quality education litigation: the tools available to courts to fashion and ensure implementation of a constitutional method of funding public education to improve schools.</p> <p>As a case study, the brief analyzes the techniques e...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Foundation for Law, Justice and Society
2009
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | <p>This policy brief examines a critical aspect of quality education litigation: the tools available to courts to fashion and ensure implementation of a constitutional method of funding public education to improve schools.</p> <p>As a case study, the brief analyzes the techniques employed by the New Jersey Supreme Court in providing a remedy to disadvantaged urban school children in the long-running Abbott v. Burke case.</p> <p>The Abbott litigation offers important lessons on how courts can improve their competency to fashion and direct implementation of a remedy to vindicate constitutionally guaranteed socio-economic rights, particularly when they implicate politically vulnerable or disenfranchised groups or classes of citizens.</p> |
|---|