Assessing proportionality in capital cases: a case study of Ohio
<p>When the United States Supreme Court approved the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, it did so based on the promise of new safeguards against comparative excessiveness and relative disproportionality resulting from jury sentencing in capital cases. As Justice...
Yazar: | Berry III, WW |
---|---|
Diğer Yazarlar: | Hoyle, C |
Materyal Türü: | Tez |
Dil: | English |
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
2011
|
Konular: |
Benzer Materyaller
-
An investigation of clemency and pardons in death penalty cases in Southeast Asia from 1975-2009
Yazar:: Pascoe, D, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013) -
Fatal distraction: does the Texas capital sentencing statute discourage the consideration of mitigating evidence?
Yazar:: Vartkessian, E
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2011) -
Individualization of punishment in the context of the public’s fear of crime
Yazar:: Konyakhin Vladimir Pavlovich, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2021-01-01) -
The responsible man: a study in two private prisons
Yazar:: Eser, S
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2014) -
Correction of miscarriages of justice in New Zealand and England
Yazar:: Birdling, M, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2012)