Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review

Background Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an important cause of stroke worldwide. Separate reports in Caucasians and Asians with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have suggested lower ICAS prevalence in Caucasians, but there has been no direct comparisons of the two ethnic groups wit...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Leng, X, Hurford, R, Feng, X, Chan, KL, Wolters, FJ, Li, L, Soo, YO, Wong, KSL, Mok, VC, Leung, TW, Rothwell, PM
Format: Journal article
Język:English
Wydane: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
_version_ 1826293114357153792
author Leng, X
Hurford, R
Feng, X
Chan, KL
Wolters, FJ
Li, L
Soo, YO
Wong, KSL
Mok, VC
Leung, TW
Rothwell, PM
author_facet Leng, X
Hurford, R
Feng, X
Chan, KL
Wolters, FJ
Li, L
Soo, YO
Wong, KSL
Mok, VC
Leung, TW
Rothwell, PM
author_sort Leng, X
collection OXFORD
description Background Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an important cause of stroke worldwide. Separate reports in Caucasians and Asians with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have suggested lower ICAS prevalence in Caucasians, but there has been no direct comparisons of the two ethnic groups with the same criteria to define ICAS. Methods Acute minor stroke or TIA patients in two cohorts respectively recruiting patients in Oxford (2011–2018, predominantly Caucasians) and Hong Kong (2011–2015, predominantly Chinese) were compared. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis/occlusion in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Prevalence, distribution and risk factors of ICAS were compared between the two cohorts. We also systematically reviewed literature on ICAS prevalence in stroke/TIA patients in different populations. Results Among 1287 patients from Oxford and 691 from Hong Kong (mean age 69 vs 66), ICAS prevalence was higher in Chinese than in Caucasians (43.0% vs 20.0%; OR 3.02; 95% CI 2.47 to 3.70; p<0.001), independent of age (age-adjusted OR 3.73; 95% CI 3.00 to 4.63; p<0.001) and vascular risk factors (multivariable-adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.56 to 4.02; p<0.001). This ethnic difference was greater (p interaction=0.005) at age <70 years (OR 5.33; 95% CI 3.79 to 7.50; p<0.001) than at ≥70 years (OR 2.81; 95% CI 2.11 to 3.74; p<0.001). ICAS prevalence increased with age and with vascular risk factors in both cohorts, with equivalent prevalence in Chinese aged <60 years and Caucasians aged ≥80, and in Chinese with no vascular risk factor and Caucasians with two vascular risk factors. ICAS locations also differed between Chinese and Caucasian patients. Conclusions Chinese are more susceptible to ICAS than Caucasians, with an earlier onset age and a higher prevalence, independent of vascular risk factors.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:25:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b8c3d9b1-6dae-44b7-b5b9-d65ecdc129de
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:25:05Z
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b8c3d9b1-6dae-44b7-b5b9-d65ecdc129de2022-03-27T04:58:11ZIntracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b8c3d9b1-6dae-44b7-b5b9-d65ecdc129deEnglishSymplectic ElementsBMJ Publishing Group2021Leng, XHurford, RFeng, XChan, KLWolters, FJLi, LSoo, YOWong, KSLMok, VCLeung, TWRothwell, PMBackground Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an important cause of stroke worldwide. Separate reports in Caucasians and Asians with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have suggested lower ICAS prevalence in Caucasians, but there has been no direct comparisons of the two ethnic groups with the same criteria to define ICAS. Methods Acute minor stroke or TIA patients in two cohorts respectively recruiting patients in Oxford (2011–2018, predominantly Caucasians) and Hong Kong (2011–2015, predominantly Chinese) were compared. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis/occlusion in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Prevalence, distribution and risk factors of ICAS were compared between the two cohorts. We also systematically reviewed literature on ICAS prevalence in stroke/TIA patients in different populations. Results Among 1287 patients from Oxford and 691 from Hong Kong (mean age 69 vs 66), ICAS prevalence was higher in Chinese than in Caucasians (43.0% vs 20.0%; OR 3.02; 95% CI 2.47 to 3.70; p<0.001), independent of age (age-adjusted OR 3.73; 95% CI 3.00 to 4.63; p<0.001) and vascular risk factors (multivariable-adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.56 to 4.02; p<0.001). This ethnic difference was greater (p interaction=0.005) at age <70 years (OR 5.33; 95% CI 3.79 to 7.50; p<0.001) than at ≥70 years (OR 2.81; 95% CI 2.11 to 3.74; p<0.001). ICAS prevalence increased with age and with vascular risk factors in both cohorts, with equivalent prevalence in Chinese aged <60 years and Caucasians aged ≥80, and in Chinese with no vascular risk factor and Caucasians with two vascular risk factors. ICAS locations also differed between Chinese and Caucasian patients. Conclusions Chinese are more susceptible to ICAS than Caucasians, with an earlier onset age and a higher prevalence, independent of vascular risk factors.
spellingShingle Leng, X
Hurford, R
Feng, X
Chan, KL
Wolters, FJ
Li, L
Soo, YO
Wong, KSL
Mok, VC
Leung, TW
Rothwell, PM
Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title_full Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title_fullStr Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title_short Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
title_sort intracranial arterial stenosis in caucasian versus chinese patients with tia and minor stroke two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review
work_keys_str_mv AT lengx intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT hurfordr intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT fengx intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT chankl intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT woltersfj intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT lil intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT sooyo intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT wongksl intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT mokvc intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT leungtw intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview
AT rothwellpm intracranialarterialstenosisincaucasianversuschinesepatientswithtiaandminorstroketwocontemporaneouscohortsandasystematicreview