Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections

One of the most influential explanations of voting behaviour is based on economic factors: when the economy is doing well, voters reward the incumbent government and when the economy is doing badly, voters punish the incumbent. This reward-punishment model is thought to be particularly appropriate a...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Tilley, J, Garry, J, Bold, T
Định dạng: Journal article
Được phát hành: Wiley Blackwell 2008
_version_ 1826293120099155968
author Tilley, J
Garry, J
Bold, T
author_facet Tilley, J
Garry, J
Bold, T
author_sort Tilley, J
collection OXFORD
description One of the most influential explanations of voting behaviour is based on economic factors: when the economy is doing well, voters reward the incumbent government and when the economy is doing badly, voters punish the incumbent. This reward-punishment model is thought to be particularly appropriate at second order contests such as European Parliament elections. Yet operationalising this economic voting model using citizens’ perceptions of economic performance may suffer from endogeneity problems if citizens’ perceptions are in fact a function of their party preferences rather than being a cause of their party preferences. Thus, this article models a ‘strict’ version of economic voting in which they purge citizens’ economic perceptions of partisan effects and only use as a predictor of voting that portion of citizens’ economic perceptions that is caused by the real world economy. Using data on voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections for 23 European Union electorates, the article finds some, but limited, evidence for economic voting that is dependent on both voter sophistication and clarity of responsibility for the economy within any country. First, only politically sophisticated voters’ subjective economic assessments are in fact grounded in economic reality. Second, the portion of subjective economic assessments that is a function of the real world economy is a significant predictor of voting only in single party government contexts where there can be a clear attribution of responsibility. For coalition government contexts, the article finds essentially no impact of the real economy via economic perceptions on vote choice, at least at European Parliament elections
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:25:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:b8ccb384-ad6d-4a98-a6a0-06c01cfab919
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:25:11Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Wiley Blackwell
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:b8ccb384-ad6d-4a98-a6a0-06c01cfab9192022-03-27T04:58:20ZPerceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament electionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b8ccb384-ad6d-4a98-a6a0-06c01cfab919Social Sciences Division - DaisyWiley Blackwell2008Tilley, JGarry, JBold, TOne of the most influential explanations of voting behaviour is based on economic factors: when the economy is doing well, voters reward the incumbent government and when the economy is doing badly, voters punish the incumbent. This reward-punishment model is thought to be particularly appropriate at second order contests such as European Parliament elections. Yet operationalising this economic voting model using citizens’ perceptions of economic performance may suffer from endogeneity problems if citizens’ perceptions are in fact a function of their party preferences rather than being a cause of their party preferences. Thus, this article models a ‘strict’ version of economic voting in which they purge citizens’ economic perceptions of partisan effects and only use as a predictor of voting that portion of citizens’ economic perceptions that is caused by the real world economy. Using data on voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections for 23 European Union electorates, the article finds some, but limited, evidence for economic voting that is dependent on both voter sophistication and clarity of responsibility for the economy within any country. First, only politically sophisticated voters’ subjective economic assessments are in fact grounded in economic reality. Second, the portion of subjective economic assessments that is a function of the real world economy is a significant predictor of voting only in single party government contexts where there can be a clear attribution of responsibility. For coalition government contexts, the article finds essentially no impact of the real economy via economic perceptions on vote choice, at least at European Parliament elections
spellingShingle Tilley, J
Garry, J
Bold, T
Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title_full Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title_fullStr Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title_short Perceptions and reality: Economic voting at the 2004 European Parliament elections
title_sort perceptions and reality economic voting at the 2004 european parliament elections
work_keys_str_mv AT tilleyj perceptionsandrealityeconomicvotingatthe2004europeanparliamentelections
AT garryj perceptionsandrealityeconomicvotingatthe2004europeanparliamentelections
AT boldt perceptionsandrealityeconomicvotingatthe2004europeanparliamentelections