Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want
“Smart” or “precision” farming has revolutionized crop agriculture but its application to livestock farming has raised ethical concerns because of its possible adverse effects on animal welfare. With rising public concern for animal welfare across the world, some people see the efficiency gains offe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826293211517157376 |
|---|---|
| author | Dawkins, M |
| author_facet | Dawkins, M |
| author_sort | Dawkins, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | “Smart” or “precision” farming has revolutionized crop agriculture but its application to livestock farming has raised ethical concerns because of its possible adverse effects on animal welfare. With rising public concern for animal welfare across the world, some people see the efficiency gains offered by the new technology as a direct threat to the animals themselves, allowing producers to get “more for less” in the interests of profit. Others see major welfare advantages through life-long health monitoring, delivery of individual care and optimization of environmental conditions. The answer to the question of whether smart farming improves or damages animal welfare is likely to depend on three main factors. Firstly, much will depend on how welfare is defined and the extent to which politicians, scientists, farmers and members of the public can agree on what welfare means and so come to a common view on how to judge how it is impacted by technology. Defining welfare as a combination of good health and what the animals themselves want provides a unifying and animal-centered way forward. It can also be directly adapted for computer recognition of welfare. A second critical factor will be whether high welfare standards are made a priority within smart farming systems. To achieve this, it will be necessary both to develop computer algorithms that can recognize welfare to the satisfaction of both the public and farmers and also to build good welfare into the control and decision-making of smart systems. What will matter most in the end, however, is a third factor, which is whether smart farming can actually deliver its promised improvements in animal welfare when applied in the real world. An ethical evaluation will only be possible when the new technologies are more widely deployed on commercial farms and their full social, environmental, financial and welfare implications become apparent. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:26:37Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:b940e27b-1173-4c81-865d-c1f720331476 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:26:37Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:b940e27b-1173-4c81-865d-c1f7203314762022-03-27T05:01:42ZDoes smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals wantJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:b940e27b-1173-4c81-865d-c1f720331476EnglishSymplectic ElementsFrontiers Media2021Dawkins, M“Smart” or “precision” farming has revolutionized crop agriculture but its application to livestock farming has raised ethical concerns because of its possible adverse effects on animal welfare. With rising public concern for animal welfare across the world, some people see the efficiency gains offered by the new technology as a direct threat to the animals themselves, allowing producers to get “more for less” in the interests of profit. Others see major welfare advantages through life-long health monitoring, delivery of individual care and optimization of environmental conditions. The answer to the question of whether smart farming improves or damages animal welfare is likely to depend on three main factors. Firstly, much will depend on how welfare is defined and the extent to which politicians, scientists, farmers and members of the public can agree on what welfare means and so come to a common view on how to judge how it is impacted by technology. Defining welfare as a combination of good health and what the animals themselves want provides a unifying and animal-centered way forward. It can also be directly adapted for computer recognition of welfare. A second critical factor will be whether high welfare standards are made a priority within smart farming systems. To achieve this, it will be necessary both to develop computer algorithms that can recognize welfare to the satisfaction of both the public and farmers and also to build good welfare into the control and decision-making of smart systems. What will matter most in the end, however, is a third factor, which is whether smart farming can actually deliver its promised improvements in animal welfare when applied in the real world. An ethical evaluation will only be possible when the new technologies are more widely deployed on commercial farms and their full social, environmental, financial and welfare implications become apparent. |
| spellingShingle | Dawkins, M Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title | Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title_full | Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title_fullStr | Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title_short | Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want |
| title_sort | does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare technology and what animals want |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dawkinsm doessmartfarmingimproveordamageanimalwelfaretechnologyandwhatanimalswant |