No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals

Every year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devolder, K, Eggel, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2019
_version_ 1826293386698555392
author Devolder, K
Eggel, M
author_facet Devolder, K
Eggel, M
author_sort Devolder, K
collection OXFORD
description Every year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue to suffer in the near to mid-term future. Given this reality, we propose the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain. We argue that our proposal would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations. We also respond to the strongest argument against our proposal-the 'no pain no gain' argument.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:29:18Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ba222e6e-3cb7-45e0-8456-d9e5575a1471
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:29:18Z
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ba222e6e-3cb7-45e0-8456-d9e5575a14712022-03-27T05:07:51ZNo pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animalsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ba222e6e-3cb7-45e0-8456-d9e5575a1471EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordMDPI2019Devolder, KEggel, MEvery year, around 12 million animals are used for the purpose of scientific research in the European Union alone. The procedures performed on them often cause significant pain and suffering. Despite regulations aimed at reducing this suffering, we can expect millions of research animals to continue to suffer in the near to mid-term future. Given this reality, we propose the use of gene editing to create research animals with a reduced capacity for suffering, in particular, from pain. We argue that our proposal would be in line with moral principles embedded in European regulations regarding animal research, and that it would facilitate compliance with these regulations. We also respond to the strongest argument against our proposal-the 'no pain no gain' argument.
spellingShingle Devolder, K
Eggel, M
No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title_full No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title_fullStr No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title_full_unstemmed No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title_short No pain, no gain? In defence of genetically disenhancing (most) research animals
title_sort no pain no gain in defence of genetically disenhancing most research animals
work_keys_str_mv AT devolderk nopainnogainindefenceofgeneticallydisenhancingmostresearchanimals
AT eggelm nopainnogainindefenceofgeneticallydisenhancingmostresearchanimals