Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Anaemia affects 60-80 % of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions remain the mainstay of treatment for anaemia but are associated with risks and are costly. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of iron supplementation by any rout...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
| _version_ | 1797091228654764032 |
|---|---|
| author | Shah, A Roy, NB McKechnie, S Doree, C Fisher, SA Stanworth, SJ |
| author_facet | Shah, A Roy, NB McKechnie, S Doree, C Fisher, SA Stanworth, SJ |
| author_sort | Shah, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Anaemia affects 60-80 % of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions remain the mainstay of treatment for anaemia but are associated with risks and are costly. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of iron supplementation by any route, in anaemic patients in adult ICUs.Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched through March 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCT)s comparing iron by any route with placebo/no iron. Primary outcomes were red blood cell transfusions and mean haemoglobin concentration. Secondary outcomes included mortality, infection, ICU and hospital length of stay, mean difference (MD) in iron biomarkers, health-related quality of life and adverse events.Five RCTs recruiting 665 patients met the inclusion criteria; intravenous iron was tested in four of the RCTs. There was no difference in allogeneic RBC transfusion requirements (relative risk 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.07, p = 0.18, five trials) or mean number of RBC units transfused (MD -0.45, 95 % CI -1.34 to 0.43, p = 0.32, two trials) in patients receiving or not receiving iron. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in haemoglobin at short-term (up to 10 days) (MD -0.25, 95 % CI -0.79 to 0.28, p = 0.35, three trials) or mid-term follow up (last measured time point in hospital or end of trial) (MD 0.21, 95 % CI -0.13 to 0.55, p = 0.23, three trials). There was no difference in secondary outcomes of mortality, in-hospital infection, or length of stay. Risk of bias was generally low although three trials had high risk of attrition bias; only one trial had low risk of bias across all domains.Iron supplementation does not reduce RBC transfusion requirements in critically ill adults, but there is considerable heterogeneity between trials in study design, nature of interventions, and outcomes. Well-designed trials are needed to investigate the optimal iron dosing regimens and strategies to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from iron, together with patient-focused outcomes.PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42015016627 . Registered 2 March 2015. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:29:59Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:ba62c0d2-3a81-421f-9add-5f504b3dce69 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:29:59Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ba62c0d2-3a81-421f-9add-5f504b3dce692022-03-27T05:09:27ZIron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ba62c0d2-3a81-421f-9add-5f504b3dce69EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2016Shah, ARoy, NBMcKechnie, SDoree, CFisher, SAStanworth, SJAnaemia affects 60-80 % of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions remain the mainstay of treatment for anaemia but are associated with risks and are costly. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of iron supplementation by any route, in anaemic patients in adult ICUs.Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched through March 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCT)s comparing iron by any route with placebo/no iron. Primary outcomes were red blood cell transfusions and mean haemoglobin concentration. Secondary outcomes included mortality, infection, ICU and hospital length of stay, mean difference (MD) in iron biomarkers, health-related quality of life and adverse events.Five RCTs recruiting 665 patients met the inclusion criteria; intravenous iron was tested in four of the RCTs. There was no difference in allogeneic RBC transfusion requirements (relative risk 0.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.07, p = 0.18, five trials) or mean number of RBC units transfused (MD -0.45, 95 % CI -1.34 to 0.43, p = 0.32, two trials) in patients receiving or not receiving iron. Similarly, there was no difference between groups in haemoglobin at short-term (up to 10 days) (MD -0.25, 95 % CI -0.79 to 0.28, p = 0.35, three trials) or mid-term follow up (last measured time point in hospital or end of trial) (MD 0.21, 95 % CI -0.13 to 0.55, p = 0.23, three trials). There was no difference in secondary outcomes of mortality, in-hospital infection, or length of stay. Risk of bias was generally low although three trials had high risk of attrition bias; only one trial had low risk of bias across all domains.Iron supplementation does not reduce RBC transfusion requirements in critically ill adults, but there is considerable heterogeneity between trials in study design, nature of interventions, and outcomes. Well-designed trials are needed to investigate the optimal iron dosing regimens and strategies to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from iron, together with patient-focused outcomes.PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42015016627 . Registered 2 March 2015. |
| spellingShingle | Shah, A Roy, NB McKechnie, S Doree, C Fisher, SA Stanworth, SJ Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title | Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | iron supplementation to treat anaemia in adult critical care patients a systematic review and meta analysis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shaha ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roynb ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mckechnies ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT doreec ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fishersa ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stanworthsj ironsupplementationtotreatanaemiainadultcriticalcarepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |