The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies
Wildlife diseases have important implications for wildlife and human health, the preservation of biodiversity and the resilience of ecosystems. However, understanding disease dynamics and the impacts of pathogens in wild populations is challenging because these complex systems can rarely, if ever, b...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797091249941905408 |
|---|---|
| author | Lachish, S Murray, K |
| author_facet | Lachish, S Murray, K |
| author_sort | Lachish, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Wildlife diseases have important implications for wildlife and human health, the preservation of biodiversity and the resilience of ecosystems. However, understanding disease dynamics and the impacts of pathogens in wild populations is challenging because these complex systems can rarely, if ever, be observed without error. Uncertainty in disease ecology studies is commonly defined in terms of either heterogeneity in detectability (due to variation in the probability of encountering, capturing, or detecting individuals in their natural habitat) or uncertainty in disease state assignment (due to misclassification errors or incomplete information). In reality, however, uncertainty in disease ecology studies extends beyond these components of observation error and can arise from multiple varied processes, each of which can lead to bias and a lack of precision in parameter estimates. Here, we present an inventory of the sources of potential uncertainty in studies that attempt to quantify disease-relevant parameters from wild populations (e.g., prevalence, incidence, transmission rates, force of infection, risk of infection, persistence times, and disease-induced impacts). We show that uncertainty can arise via processes pertaining to aspects of the disease system, the study design, the methods used to study the system, and the state of knowledge of the system, and that uncertainties generated via one process can propagate through to others because of interactions between the numerous biological, methodological and environmental factors at play. We show that many of these sources of uncertainty may not be immediately apparent to researchers (for example, unidentified crypticity among vectors, hosts or pathogens, a mismatch between the temporal scale of sampling and disease dynamics, demographic or social misclassification), and thus have received comparatively little consideration in the literature to date. Finally, we discuss the type of bias or imprecision introduced by these varied sources of uncertainty and briefly present appropriate sampling and analytical methods to account for, or minimise, their influence on estimates of disease-relevant parameters. This review should assist researchers and practitioners to navigate the pitfalls of uncertainty in wildlife disease ecology studies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:30:19Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:ba7d28a2-192b-4bb9-ab0d-c58af24b496b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:30:19Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:ba7d28a2-192b-4bb9-ab0d-c58af24b496b2022-03-27T05:10:13ZThe certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studiesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ba7d28a2-192b-4bb9-ab0d-c58af24b496bSymplectic Elements at OxfordFrontiers Media2018Lachish, SMurray, KWildlife diseases have important implications for wildlife and human health, the preservation of biodiversity and the resilience of ecosystems. However, understanding disease dynamics and the impacts of pathogens in wild populations is challenging because these complex systems can rarely, if ever, be observed without error. Uncertainty in disease ecology studies is commonly defined in terms of either heterogeneity in detectability (due to variation in the probability of encountering, capturing, or detecting individuals in their natural habitat) or uncertainty in disease state assignment (due to misclassification errors or incomplete information). In reality, however, uncertainty in disease ecology studies extends beyond these components of observation error and can arise from multiple varied processes, each of which can lead to bias and a lack of precision in parameter estimates. Here, we present an inventory of the sources of potential uncertainty in studies that attempt to quantify disease-relevant parameters from wild populations (e.g., prevalence, incidence, transmission rates, force of infection, risk of infection, persistence times, and disease-induced impacts). We show that uncertainty can arise via processes pertaining to aspects of the disease system, the study design, the methods used to study the system, and the state of knowledge of the system, and that uncertainties generated via one process can propagate through to others because of interactions between the numerous biological, methodological and environmental factors at play. We show that many of these sources of uncertainty may not be immediately apparent to researchers (for example, unidentified crypticity among vectors, hosts or pathogens, a mismatch between the temporal scale of sampling and disease dynamics, demographic or social misclassification), and thus have received comparatively little consideration in the literature to date. Finally, we discuss the type of bias or imprecision introduced by these varied sources of uncertainty and briefly present appropriate sampling and analytical methods to account for, or minimise, their influence on estimates of disease-relevant parameters. This review should assist researchers and practitioners to navigate the pitfalls of uncertainty in wildlife disease ecology studies. |
| spellingShingle | Lachish, S Murray, K The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title | The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title_full | The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title_fullStr | The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title_full_unstemmed | The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title_short | The certainty of uncertainty: Potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| title_sort | certainty of uncertainty potential sources of bias and imprecision in disease ecology studies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lachishs thecertaintyofuncertaintypotentialsourcesofbiasandimprecisionindiseaseecologystudies AT murrayk thecertaintyofuncertaintypotentialsourcesofbiasandimprecisionindiseaseecologystudies AT lachishs certaintyofuncertaintypotentialsourcesofbiasandimprecisionindiseaseecologystudies AT murrayk certaintyofuncertaintypotentialsourcesofbiasandimprecisionindiseaseecologystudies |