EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015

<p>Objective: Cost per quality-adjusted life year data are required for reimbursement decisions in many Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. EQ-5D is by far the most commonly used instrument to generate utility values in CEE. This study aims to systematically review the literature on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rencz, F, Gulácsi, L, Drummond, M, Golicki, D, Prevolnik Rupel, V, Simon, J, Stolk, E, Brodszky, V, Baji, P, Závada, J, Petrova, G, Rotar, A, Péntek, M
Format: Journal article
Published: Springer Verlag 2017
_version_ 1826293643151933440
author Rencz, F
Gulácsi, L
Drummond, M
Golicki, D
Prevolnik Rupel, V
Simon, J
Stolk, E
Brodszky, V
Baji, P
Závada, J
Petrova, G
Rotar, A
Péntek, M
author_facet Rencz, F
Gulácsi, L
Drummond, M
Golicki, D
Prevolnik Rupel, V
Simon, J
Stolk, E
Brodszky, V
Baji, P
Závada, J
Petrova, G
Rotar, A
Péntek, M
author_sort Rencz, F
collection OXFORD
description <p>Objective: Cost per quality-adjusted life year data are required for reimbursement decisions in many Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. EQ-5D is by far the most commonly used instrument to generate utility values in CEE. This study aims to systematically review the literature on EQ-5D from eight CEE countries.</p> <p>Methods: An electronic database search was performed up to 1 July 2015 to identify original EQ-5D studies from the countries of interest. We analysed the use of EQ-5D with respect to clinical areas, methodological rigor, population norms and value sets.</p> <p>Results: We identified 143 studies providing 152 country-specific results with a total sample size of 81,619: Austria (n = 11), Bulgaria (n = 6), Czech Republic (n = 18), Hungary (n = 47), Poland (n = 51), Romania (n = 2), Slovakia (n = 3) and Slovenia (n = 14). Cardiovascular (21 %), neurologic (17 %), musculoskeletal (15 %) and endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (13 %) were the most frequently studied clinical areas. Overall, 112 (78 %) of the studies reported EQ VAS results and 86 (60 %) EQ-5D index scores, of which 27 (31 %) did not specify the applied tariff. Hungary, Poland and Slovenia have population norms. Poland and Slovenia also have a national value set.</p> <p>Conclusions: Increasing use of EQ-5D is observed throughout CEE. The spread of health technology assessment activities in countries seems to be reflected in the number of EQ-5D studies. However, improvement in informed use and methodological quality of reporting is needed. In jurisdictions where no national value set is available, in order to ensure comparability we recommend to apply the most frequently used UK tariff. Regional collaboration between CEE countries should be strengthened.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:33:18Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:bb6e64d6-e307-48d4-a20c-ee2ff08cf8d2
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:33:18Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Verlag
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:bb6e64d6-e307-48d4-a20c-ee2ff08cf8d22022-03-27T05:17:02ZEQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:bb6e64d6-e307-48d4-a20c-ee2ff08cf8d2Symplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Verlag2017Rencz, FGulácsi, LDrummond, MGolicki, DPrevolnik Rupel, VSimon, JStolk, EBrodszky, VBaji, PZávada, JPetrova, GRotar, APéntek, M<p>Objective: Cost per quality-adjusted life year data are required for reimbursement decisions in many Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. EQ-5D is by far the most commonly used instrument to generate utility values in CEE. This study aims to systematically review the literature on EQ-5D from eight CEE countries.</p> <p>Methods: An electronic database search was performed up to 1 July 2015 to identify original EQ-5D studies from the countries of interest. We analysed the use of EQ-5D with respect to clinical areas, methodological rigor, population norms and value sets.</p> <p>Results: We identified 143 studies providing 152 country-specific results with a total sample size of 81,619: Austria (n = 11), Bulgaria (n = 6), Czech Republic (n = 18), Hungary (n = 47), Poland (n = 51), Romania (n = 2), Slovakia (n = 3) and Slovenia (n = 14). Cardiovascular (21 %), neurologic (17 %), musculoskeletal (15 %) and endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (13 %) were the most frequently studied clinical areas. Overall, 112 (78 %) of the studies reported EQ VAS results and 86 (60 %) EQ-5D index scores, of which 27 (31 %) did not specify the applied tariff. Hungary, Poland and Slovenia have population norms. Poland and Slovenia also have a national value set.</p> <p>Conclusions: Increasing use of EQ-5D is observed throughout CEE. The spread of health technology assessment activities in countries seems to be reflected in the number of EQ-5D studies. However, improvement in informed use and methodological quality of reporting is needed. In jurisdictions where no national value set is available, in order to ensure comparability we recommend to apply the most frequently used UK tariff. Regional collaboration between CEE countries should be strengthened.</p>
spellingShingle Rencz, F
Gulácsi, L
Drummond, M
Golicki, D
Prevolnik Rupel, V
Simon, J
Stolk, E
Brodszky, V
Baji, P
Závada, J
Petrova, G
Rotar, A
Péntek, M
EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title_full EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title_fullStr EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title_full_unstemmed EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title_short EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015
title_sort eq 5d in central and eastern europe 2000 2015
work_keys_str_mv AT renczf eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT gulacsil eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT drummondm eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT golickid eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT prevolnikrupelv eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT simonj eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT stolke eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT brodszkyv eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT bajip eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT zavadaj eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT petrovag eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT rotara eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015
AT pentekm eq5dincentralandeasterneurope20002015