Avatars and arrows in the brain

<p style="text-align:justify;"> In this Commentary article we critically assess the claims made by Schurz, Kronbichler, Weissengrubler, Surtees, Samson and Perner (2015) relating to the neural processes underlying theory of mind and visual perspective taking. They attempt to integra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catmur, C, Santiesteban, I, Conway, J, Heyes, C, Bird, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016
_version_ 1797091753731293184
author Catmur, C
Santiesteban, I
Conway, J
Heyes, C
Bird, G
author_facet Catmur, C
Santiesteban, I
Conway, J
Heyes, C
Bird, G
author_sort Catmur, C
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;"> In this Commentary article we critically assess the claims made by Schurz, Kronbichler, Weissengrubler, Surtees, Samson and Perner (2015) relating to the neural processes underlying theory of mind and visual perspective taking. They attempt to integrate research findings in these two areas of social neuroscience using a perspective taking task contrasting mentalistic agents (‘avatars’), with non-mentalistic control stimuli (‘arrows’), during functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We support this endeavour whole-heartedly, agreeing that the integration of findings in these areas has been neglected in research on the social brain. However, we cannot find among the behavioural or neuroimaging data presented by Schurz et al. evidence supporting their claim of ‘implicit mentalizing’—the automatic ascription of mental states to another representing what they can see. Indeed, we suggest that neuroimaging methods may be ill-suited to address the existence of implicit mentalizing, and suggest that approaches utilizing neurostimulation methods are likely to be more successful. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:37:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:bcabb9de-c93c-4e04-9c38-7f9ae9086fa8
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:37:06Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:bcabb9de-c93c-4e04-9c38-7f9ae9086fa82022-03-27T05:26:03ZAvatars and arrows in the brainJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:bcabb9de-c93c-4e04-9c38-7f9ae9086fa8EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2016Catmur, CSantiesteban, IConway, JHeyes, CBird, G <p style="text-align:justify;"> In this Commentary article we critically assess the claims made by Schurz, Kronbichler, Weissengrubler, Surtees, Samson and Perner (2015) relating to the neural processes underlying theory of mind and visual perspective taking. They attempt to integrate research findings in these two areas of social neuroscience using a perspective taking task contrasting mentalistic agents (‘avatars’), with non-mentalistic control stimuli (‘arrows’), during functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We support this endeavour whole-heartedly, agreeing that the integration of findings in these areas has been neglected in research on the social brain. However, we cannot find among the behavioural or neuroimaging data presented by Schurz et al. evidence supporting their claim of ‘implicit mentalizing’—the automatic ascription of mental states to another representing what they can see. Indeed, we suggest that neuroimaging methods may be ill-suited to address the existence of implicit mentalizing, and suggest that approaches utilizing neurostimulation methods are likely to be more successful. </p>
spellingShingle Catmur, C
Santiesteban, I
Conway, J
Heyes, C
Bird, G
Avatars and arrows in the brain
title Avatars and arrows in the brain
title_full Avatars and arrows in the brain
title_fullStr Avatars and arrows in the brain
title_full_unstemmed Avatars and arrows in the brain
title_short Avatars and arrows in the brain
title_sort avatars and arrows in the brain
work_keys_str_mv AT catmurc avatarsandarrowsinthebrain
AT santiestebani avatarsandarrowsinthebrain
AT conwayj avatarsandarrowsinthebrain
AT heyesc avatarsandarrowsinthebrain
AT birdg avatarsandarrowsinthebrain