A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming

The early twentieth-century warming (EW; 1910–45) and the mid-twentieth-century cooling (MC; 1950–80) have been linked to both internal variability of the climate system and changes in external radiative forcing. The degree to which either of the two factors contributed to EW and MC, or both, is sti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haustein, K, Otto, F, Venema, V, Jacobs, P, Cowtan, K, Hausfather, Z, Way, R, White, B, Subramanian, A, Schurer, A
Format: Journal article
Published: American Meteorological Society 2019
_version_ 1797091873552072704
author Haustein, K
Otto, F
Venema, V
Jacobs, P
Cowtan, K
Hausfather, Z
Way, R
White, B
Subramanian, A
Schurer, A
author_facet Haustein, K
Otto, F
Venema, V
Jacobs, P
Cowtan, K
Hausfather, Z
Way, R
White, B
Subramanian, A
Schurer, A
author_sort Haustein, K
collection OXFORD
description The early twentieth-century warming (EW; 1910–45) and the mid-twentieth-century cooling (MC; 1950–80) have been linked to both internal variability of the climate system and changes in external radiative forcing. The degree to which either of the two factors contributed to EW and MC, or both, is still debated. Using a two-box impulse response model, we demonstrate that multidecadal ocean variability was unlikely to be the driver of observed changes in global mean surface temperature (GMST) after AD 1850. Instead, virtually all (97%–98%) of the global low-frequency variability (.30 years) can be explained by external forcing. We find similarly high percentages of explained variance for interhemispheric and land–ocean temperature evolution. Three key aspects are identified that underpin the conclusion of this new study: inhomogeneous anthropogenic aerosol forcing (AER), biases in the instrumental sea surface temperature (SST) datasets, and inadequate representation of the response to varying forcing factors. Once the spatially heterogeneous nature of AER is accounted for, the MC period is reconcilable with external drivers. SST biases and imprecise forcing responses explain the putative disagreement between models and observations during the EW period. As a consequence, Atlantic multidecadal variability (AMV) is found to be primarily controlled by external forcing too. Future attribution studies should account for these important factors when discriminating between externally forced and internally generated influences on climate. We argue that AMV must not be used as a regressor and suggest a revised AMV index instead [the North Atlantic Variability Index (NAVI)]. Our associated best estimate for the transient climate response (TCR) is 1.57 K (60.70 at the 5%–95% confidence level).
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:38:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:bd20efc1-f18e-41d9-ac10-9f8bc78057ba
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:38:34Z
publishDate 2019
publisher American Meteorological Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:bd20efc1-f18e-41d9-ac10-9f8bc78057ba2022-03-27T05:29:23ZA limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warmingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:bd20efc1-f18e-41d9-ac10-9f8bc78057baSymplectic Elements at OxfordAmerican Meteorological Society2019Haustein, KOtto, FVenema, VJacobs, PCowtan, KHausfather, ZWay, RWhite, BSubramanian, ASchurer, AThe early twentieth-century warming (EW; 1910–45) and the mid-twentieth-century cooling (MC; 1950–80) have been linked to both internal variability of the climate system and changes in external radiative forcing. The degree to which either of the two factors contributed to EW and MC, or both, is still debated. Using a two-box impulse response model, we demonstrate that multidecadal ocean variability was unlikely to be the driver of observed changes in global mean surface temperature (GMST) after AD 1850. Instead, virtually all (97%–98%) of the global low-frequency variability (.30 years) can be explained by external forcing. We find similarly high percentages of explained variance for interhemispheric and land–ocean temperature evolution. Three key aspects are identified that underpin the conclusion of this new study: inhomogeneous anthropogenic aerosol forcing (AER), biases in the instrumental sea surface temperature (SST) datasets, and inadequate representation of the response to varying forcing factors. Once the spatially heterogeneous nature of AER is accounted for, the MC period is reconcilable with external drivers. SST biases and imprecise forcing responses explain the putative disagreement between models and observations during the EW period. As a consequence, Atlantic multidecadal variability (AMV) is found to be primarily controlled by external forcing too. Future attribution studies should account for these important factors when discriminating between externally forced and internally generated influences on climate. We argue that AMV must not be used as a regressor and suggest a revised AMV index instead [the North Atlantic Variability Index (NAVI)]. Our associated best estimate for the transient climate response (TCR) is 1.57 K (60.70 at the 5%–95% confidence level).
spellingShingle Haustein, K
Otto, F
Venema, V
Jacobs, P
Cowtan, K
Hausfather, Z
Way, R
White, B
Subramanian, A
Schurer, A
A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title_full A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title_fullStr A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title_full_unstemmed A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title_short A limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth-century warming
title_sort limited role for unforced internal variability in twentieth century warming
work_keys_str_mv AT hausteink alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT ottof alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT venemav alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT jacobsp alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT cowtank alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT hausfatherz alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT wayr alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT whiteb alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT subramaniana alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT schurera alimitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT hausteink limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT ottof limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT venemav limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT jacobsp limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT cowtank limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT hausfatherz limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT wayr limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT whiteb limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT subramaniana limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming
AT schurera limitedroleforunforcedinternalvariabilityintwentiethcenturywarming