Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.

Fitch's argument purports to show that if all truths are knowable then all truths are known. The argument exploits the fact that the knowledge predicate or operator is untyped and may thus apply to sentences containing itself. This article outlines a response to Fitch's argument based on t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paseau, A
Format: Journal article
Published: 2008
_version_ 1826294110515888128
author Paseau, A
author_facet Paseau, A
author_sort Paseau, A
collection OXFORD
description Fitch's argument purports to show that if all truths are knowable then all truths are known. The argument exploits the fact that the knowledge predicate or operator is untyped and may thus apply to sentences containing itself. This article outlines a response to Fitch's argument based on the idea that knowledge is typed. The first part of the article outlines the philosophical motivation for the view, comparing it to the motivation behind typing truth. The second, formal part presents a logic in which knowledge is typed and demonstrates that it allows nonlogical truths to be knowable yet unknown. © 2008 by University of Notre Dame.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:40:34Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:bdc07197-2f0f-4341-8bd9-b28107fd3c0b
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:40:34Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:bdc07197-2f0f-4341-8bd9-b28107fd3c0b2022-03-27T05:34:07ZFitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:bdc07197-2f0f-4341-8bd9-b28107fd3c0bSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Paseau, AFitch's argument purports to show that if all truths are knowable then all truths are known. The argument exploits the fact that the knowledge predicate or operator is untyped and may thus apply to sentences containing itself. This article outlines a response to Fitch's argument based on the idea that knowledge is typed. The first part of the article outlines the philosophical motivation for the view, comparing it to the motivation behind typing truth. The second, formal part presents a logic in which knowledge is typed and demonstrates that it allows nonlogical truths to be knowable yet unknown. © 2008 by University of Notre Dame.
spellingShingle Paseau, A
Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title_full Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title_fullStr Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title_full_unstemmed Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title_short Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.
title_sort fitch s argument and typing knowledge
work_keys_str_mv AT paseaua fitchsargumentandtypingknowledge