Why general jurisprudence is interesting
In a recent article entitled, ‘Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?’, David Enoch answers his own question resoundingly in the negative. This article critically examines the character of Enoch’s claim, the presuppositions it rests on, and the way in which he seeks to establish it. Having argued tha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM
2017
|
| _version_ | 1797092115299172352 |
|---|---|
| author | Dickson, J |
| author_facet | Dickson, J |
| author_sort | Dickson, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In a recent article entitled, ‘Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?’, David Enoch answers his own question resoundingly in the negative. This article critically examines the character of Enoch’s claim, the presuppositions it rests on, and the way in which he seeks to establish it. Having argued that many of Enoch’s views in this regard hinge on a narrow and idiosyncratic understanding of the questions that general jurisprudence addresses, and of the relations between those questions and many other inquiries concerning the character of law, the article concludes by offering its author’s own vision of what makes general jurisprudence engaging, intriguing, and … well … interesting. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:41:45Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:be221709-6f3c-46ae-b0b8-4b9fefc9de33 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:41:45Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:be221709-6f3c-46ae-b0b8-4b9fefc9de332022-03-27T05:37:00ZWhy general jurisprudence is interestingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:be221709-6f3c-46ae-b0b8-4b9fefc9de33Symplectic Elements at OxfordInstituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM2017Dickson, JIn a recent article entitled, ‘Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?’, David Enoch answers his own question resoundingly in the negative. This article critically examines the character of Enoch’s claim, the presuppositions it rests on, and the way in which he seeks to establish it. Having argued that many of Enoch’s views in this regard hinge on a narrow and idiosyncratic understanding of the questions that general jurisprudence addresses, and of the relations between those questions and many other inquiries concerning the character of law, the article concludes by offering its author’s own vision of what makes general jurisprudence engaging, intriguing, and … well … interesting. |
| spellingShingle | Dickson, J Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title | Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title_full | Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title_fullStr | Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title_short | Why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| title_sort | why general jurisprudence is interesting |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dicksonj whygeneraljurisprudenceisinteresting |