Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16.
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are the two major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), for which there are currently no licenced treatments. Here, the acquisition of resistance towards two novel capsid-binding compounds, NLD and ALD, was studied and compared...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2015
|
| _version_ | 1797092120513740800 |
|---|---|
| author | Kelly, J De Colibus, L Elliott, L Fry, E Stuart, D Rowlands, D Stonehouse, N |
| author_facet | Kelly, J De Colibus, L Elliott, L Fry, E Stuart, D Rowlands, D Stonehouse, N |
| author_sort | Kelly, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are the two major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), for which there are currently no licenced treatments. Here, the acquisition of resistance towards two novel capsid-binding compounds, NLD and ALD, was studied and compared to the analogous compound GPP3. During serial passage, EV71 rapidly became resistant to each compound and mutations at residues I113 and V123 in VP1 were identified. A mutation at residue 113 was also identified in CVA16 after passage with GPP3. The mutations were associated with reduced thermostability and were rapidly lost in the absence of inhibitors. In silico modelling suggested that the mutations prevented the compounds from binding the VP1 pocket in the capsid. Although both viruses developed resistance to these potent pocket-binding compounds, the acquired mutations were associated with large fitness costs and reverted to WT phenotype and sequence rapidly in the absence of inhibitors. The most effective inhibitor, NLD, had a very large selectivity index, showing interesting pharmacological properties as a novel anti-EV71 agent. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:41:49Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:be28355e-3169-44a4-88be-18316e86f6d3 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:41:49Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:be28355e-3169-44a4-88be-18316e86f6d32022-03-27T05:37:12ZPotent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:be28355e-3169-44a4-88be-18316e86f6d3EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2015Kelly, JDe Colibus, LElliott, LFry, EStuart, DRowlands, DStonehouse, NEnterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are the two major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), for which there are currently no licenced treatments. Here, the acquisition of resistance towards two novel capsid-binding compounds, NLD and ALD, was studied and compared to the analogous compound GPP3. During serial passage, EV71 rapidly became resistant to each compound and mutations at residues I113 and V123 in VP1 were identified. A mutation at residue 113 was also identified in CVA16 after passage with GPP3. The mutations were associated with reduced thermostability and were rapidly lost in the absence of inhibitors. In silico modelling suggested that the mutations prevented the compounds from binding the VP1 pocket in the capsid. Although both viruses developed resistance to these potent pocket-binding compounds, the acquired mutations were associated with large fitness costs and reverted to WT phenotype and sequence rapidly in the absence of inhibitors. The most effective inhibitor, NLD, had a very large selectivity index, showing interesting pharmacological properties as a novel anti-EV71 agent. |
| spellingShingle | Kelly, J De Colibus, L Elliott, L Fry, E Stuart, D Rowlands, D Stonehouse, N Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title | Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title_full | Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title_fullStr | Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title_short | Potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically-stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or Coxsackievirus A16. |
| title_sort | potent antiviral agents fail to elicit genetically stable resistance mutations in either enterovirus 71 or coxsackievirus a16 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kellyj potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT decolibusl potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT elliottl potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT frye potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT stuartd potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT rowlandsd potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 AT stonehousen potentantiviralagentsfailtoelicitgeneticallystableresistancemutationsineitherenterovirus71orcoxsackievirusa16 |