Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.

A trial of nonescalated conformal versus conventional radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer has been carried out at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (RMH) and Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), demonstrating a significant reduction in the rate of rectal bleeding reported for patients treated using t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fenwick, J, Nahum, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2001
_version_ 1797092149057028096
author Fenwick, J
Nahum, A
author_facet Fenwick, J
Nahum, A
author_sort Fenwick, J
collection OXFORD
description A trial of nonescalated conformal versus conventional radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer has been carried out at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (RMH) and Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), demonstrating a significant reduction in the rate of rectal bleeding reported for patients treated using the conformal technique. The relationship between planned rectal dose-distributions and incidences of bleeding has been analyzed, showing that the rate of bleeding falls significantly as the extent of the rectal wall receiving a planned dose-level of more than 57 Gy is reduced. Dose-distributions delivered to the rectal wall over the course of radiotherapy treatment inevitably differ from planned distributions, due to sources of uncertainty such as patient setup error, rectal wall movement and variation in the absolute rectal wall surface area. In this paper estimates of the differences between planned and treated rectal dose-distribution parameters are obtained for the RMH/ICR nonescalated conformal technique, working from a distribution of setup errors observed during the RMH/ICR trial, movement data supplied by Lebesque and colleagues derived from repeat CT scans, and estimates of rectal circumference variations extracted from the literature. Setup errors and wall movement are found to cause only limited systematic differences between mean treated and planned rectal dose-distribution parameter values, but introduce considerable uncertainties into the treated values of some dose-distribution parameters: setup errors lead to 22% and 9% relative uncertainties in the highly dosed fraction of the rectal wall and the wall average dose, respectively, with wall movement leading to 21% and 9% relative uncertainties. Estimates obtained from the literature of the uncertainty in the absolute surface area of the distensible rectal wall are of the order of 13%-18%. In a subsequent paper the impact of these uncertainties on analyses of the relationship between incidences of bleeding and planned rectal dose-distributions is explored.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:42:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:be418d71-4189-42f8-82ae-2a7eca641e5f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:42:06Z
publishDate 2001
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:be418d71-4189-42f8-82ae-2a7eca641e5f2022-03-27T05:37:51ZImpact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:be418d71-4189-42f8-82ae-2a7eca641e5fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2001Fenwick, JNahum, AA trial of nonescalated conformal versus conventional radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer has been carried out at the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (RMH) and Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), demonstrating a significant reduction in the rate of rectal bleeding reported for patients treated using the conformal technique. The relationship between planned rectal dose-distributions and incidences of bleeding has been analyzed, showing that the rate of bleeding falls significantly as the extent of the rectal wall receiving a planned dose-level of more than 57 Gy is reduced. Dose-distributions delivered to the rectal wall over the course of radiotherapy treatment inevitably differ from planned distributions, due to sources of uncertainty such as patient setup error, rectal wall movement and variation in the absolute rectal wall surface area. In this paper estimates of the differences between planned and treated rectal dose-distribution parameters are obtained for the RMH/ICR nonescalated conformal technique, working from a distribution of setup errors observed during the RMH/ICR trial, movement data supplied by Lebesque and colleagues derived from repeat CT scans, and estimates of rectal circumference variations extracted from the literature. Setup errors and wall movement are found to cause only limited systematic differences between mean treated and planned rectal dose-distribution parameter values, but introduce considerable uncertainties into the treated values of some dose-distribution parameters: setup errors lead to 22% and 9% relative uncertainties in the highly dosed fraction of the rectal wall and the wall average dose, respectively, with wall movement leading to 21% and 9% relative uncertainties. Estimates obtained from the literature of the uncertainty in the absolute surface area of the distensible rectal wall are of the order of 13%-18%. In a subsequent paper the impact of these uncertainties on analyses of the relationship between incidences of bleeding and planned rectal dose-distributions is explored.
spellingShingle Fenwick, J
Nahum, A
Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title_full Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title_fullStr Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title_short Impact of dose-distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling. I: Uncertainty estimates.
title_sort impact of dose distribution uncertainties on rectal ntcp modeling i uncertainty estimates
work_keys_str_mv AT fenwickj impactofdosedistributionuncertaintiesonrectalntcpmodelingiuncertaintyestimates
AT nahuma impactofdosedistributionuncertaintiesonrectalntcpmodelingiuncertaintyestimates