Defining ℤ in ℚ
We show that Z is definable in Q by a universal first-order formula in the language of rings. We also present an ∀∃-formula for Z in Q with just one universal quantifier. We exhibit new diophantine subsets of Q like the complement of the image of the norm map under a quadratic extension, and we give...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Princeton University, Department of Mathematics
2016
|
_version_ | 1826294416458907648 |
---|---|
author | Koenigsmann, J |
author_facet | Koenigsmann, J |
author_sort | Koenigsmann, J |
collection | OXFORD |
description | We show that Z is definable in Q by a universal first-order formula in the language of rings. We also present an ∀∃-formula for Z in Q with just one universal quantifier. We exhibit new diophantine subsets of Q like the complement of the image of the norm map under a quadratic extension, and we give an elementary proof for the fact that the set of non-squares is diophantine. Finally, we show that there is no existential formula for Z in Q, provided one assumes a strong variant of the Bombieri-Lang Conjecture for varieties over Q with many Q-rational points. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:45:18Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:bf44cb00-150e-4e4d-80c5-a123ae5cc21d |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:45:18Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Princeton University, Department of Mathematics |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:bf44cb00-150e-4e4d-80c5-a123ae5cc21d2022-03-27T05:46:06ZDefining ℤ in ℚJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:bf44cb00-150e-4e4d-80c5-a123ae5cc21dSymplectic Elements at OxfordPrinceton University, Department of Mathematics2016Koenigsmann, JWe show that Z is definable in Q by a universal first-order formula in the language of rings. We also present an ∀∃-formula for Z in Q with just one universal quantifier. We exhibit new diophantine subsets of Q like the complement of the image of the norm map under a quadratic extension, and we give an elementary proof for the fact that the set of non-squares is diophantine. Finally, we show that there is no existential formula for Z in Q, provided one assumes a strong variant of the Bombieri-Lang Conjecture for varieties over Q with many Q-rational points. |
spellingShingle | Koenigsmann, J Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title | Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title_full | Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title_fullStr | Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title_short | Defining ℤ in ℚ |
title_sort | defining z in q |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koenigsmannj definingzinq |