Defining ℤ in ℚ
We show that Z is definable in Q by a universal first-order formula in the language of rings. We also present an ∀∃-formula for Z in Q with just one universal quantifier. We exhibit new diophantine subsets of Q like the complement of the image of the norm map under a quadratic extension, and we give...
Main Author: | Koenigsmann, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Princeton University, Department of Mathematics
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Defining $\mathbb{Z}$ in $\mathbb{Q}$
by: Koenigsmann, J
Published: (2010) -
Defining Transcendentals in Function Fields.
by: Koenigsmann, J
Published: (2002) -
Defining coarsenings of valuations
by: Jahnke, F, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Definable henselian valuations
by: Jahnke, F, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Definable henselian valuations
by: Jahnke, F, et al.
Published: (2015)