Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics
The study of reputation is one of the foundational topics of modern international relations. However, fundamental questions remain, including the question of to whom reputations adhere: states, leaders, or both? We offer a theory of influence‐specific reputations (ISR) that unifies competing account...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826294583759208448 |
|---|---|
| author | Renshon, J Dafoe, A Huth, P |
| author_facet | Renshon, J Dafoe, A Huth, P |
| author_sort | Renshon, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The study of reputation is one of the foundational topics of modern international relations. However, fundamental questions remain, including the question of to whom reputations adhere: states, leaders, or both? We offer a theory of influence‐specific reputations (ISR) that unifies competing accounts of reputation formation. We theorize that reputations will adhere more to actors who are more influential in the relevant decision‐making process. We employ two survey experiments, one abstract and one richly detailed involving a U.S.‐Iran conflict, to evaluate ISR. We find evidence of large country‐specific reputations and moderately sized leader‐specific reputations. Consistent with the theory of influence‐specific reputations, leader‐specific reputations are more important when leaders are more influential. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:47:55Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:c028c9b3-1b51-454f-88cb-156564b0877f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:47:55Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:c028c9b3-1b51-454f-88cb-156564b0877f2022-03-27T05:52:42ZLeader influence and reputation formation in world politicsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c028c9b3-1b51-454f-88cb-156564b0877fEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2018Renshon, JDafoe, AHuth, PThe study of reputation is one of the foundational topics of modern international relations. However, fundamental questions remain, including the question of to whom reputations adhere: states, leaders, or both? We offer a theory of influence‐specific reputations (ISR) that unifies competing accounts of reputation formation. We theorize that reputations will adhere more to actors who are more influential in the relevant decision‐making process. We employ two survey experiments, one abstract and one richly detailed involving a U.S.‐Iran conflict, to evaluate ISR. We find evidence of large country‐specific reputations and moderately sized leader‐specific reputations. Consistent with the theory of influence‐specific reputations, leader‐specific reputations are more important when leaders are more influential. |
| spellingShingle | Renshon, J Dafoe, A Huth, P Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title | Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title_full | Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title_fullStr | Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title_short | Leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| title_sort | leader influence and reputation formation in world politics |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT renshonj leaderinfluenceandreputationformationinworldpolitics AT dafoea leaderinfluenceandreputationformationinworldpolitics AT huthp leaderinfluenceandreputationformationinworldpolitics |