Procuring wrongs

In certain circumstances, tort law imposes liability for procuring the commission of wrongs. This chapter focuses on one such instance the origin of which is the High Court’s decision in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevillja. In that case, it was held that it was sufficiently arguable for the purposes of s...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: Goudkamp, J
अन्य लेखक: Probert, R
स्वरूप: Book section
भाषा:English
प्रकाशित: Oxford University Press 2023
_version_ 1826312894450499584
author Goudkamp, J
author2 Probert, R
author_facet Probert, R
Goudkamp, J
author_sort Goudkamp, J
collection OXFORD
description In certain circumstances, tort law imposes liability for procuring the commission of wrongs. This chapter focuses on one such instance the origin of which is the High Court’s decision in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevillja. In that case, it was held that it was sufficiently arguable for the purposes of securing jurisdiction that it was tortious intentionally and knowingly to induce a violation of rights in a judgment debt. Subsequent cases have confirmed the tort’s existence on the basis that it finds a close analogy with the tort of inducing a breach of contract. This chapter examines the evolution of this new head of liability and its scope. It also explores some of its wider implications for the law of torts.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:07:05Z
format Book section
id oxford-uuid:c032d76f-6b6a-4a83-94d9-8e4397e42c12
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:02:20Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c032d76f-6b6a-4a83-94d9-8e4397e42c122024-05-03T09:38:31ZProcuring wrongsBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:c032d76f-6b6a-4a83-94d9-8e4397e42c12EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2023Goudkamp, JProbert, RPeel, EIn certain circumstances, tort law imposes liability for procuring the commission of wrongs. This chapter focuses on one such instance the origin of which is the High Court’s decision in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevillja. In that case, it was held that it was sufficiently arguable for the purposes of securing jurisdiction that it was tortious intentionally and knowingly to induce a violation of rights in a judgment debt. Subsequent cases have confirmed the tort’s existence on the basis that it finds a close analogy with the tort of inducing a breach of contract. This chapter examines the evolution of this new head of liability and its scope. It also explores some of its wider implications for the law of torts.
spellingShingle Goudkamp, J
Procuring wrongs
title Procuring wrongs
title_full Procuring wrongs
title_fullStr Procuring wrongs
title_full_unstemmed Procuring wrongs
title_short Procuring wrongs
title_sort procuring wrongs
work_keys_str_mv AT goudkampj procuringwrongs