Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale

<p><strong>Objective</strong> This study assessed the psychometric properties of three versions of the Parenting Scale (PS; original PS, 13-item version, and 10-item version) in three European middle-income countries.<br><br> <strong>Background</strong> The...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Prandstetter, K, Waller, F, Heinrichs, N, Hutchings, J, Ward, CL, Danila, I, Lachman, JM, Foran, HM
Aineistotyyppi: Journal article
Kieli:English
Julkaistu: Wiley 2022
_version_ 1826310539788156928
author Prandstetter, K
Waller, F
Heinrichs, N
Hutchings, J
Ward, CL
Danila, I
Lachman, JM
Foran, HM
author_facet Prandstetter, K
Waller, F
Heinrichs, N
Hutchings, J
Ward, CL
Danila, I
Lachman, JM
Foran, HM
author_sort Prandstetter, K
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objective</strong> This study assessed the psychometric properties of three versions of the Parenting Scale (PS; original PS, 13-item version, and 10-item version) in three European middle-income countries.<br><br> <strong>Background</strong> The PS is one of the most frequently used questionnaires for measuring dysfunctional discipline strategies. Although its validity has been extensively investigated in American samples, there are mixed results regarding the recommended number of items and subscales, raising the question of replicability across European middle-income countries.<br><br> <strong>Method</strong> Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) and item response theory (IRT) were applied to <em>N</em> = 835 parents from North Macedonia, Moldova, and Romania.<br><br> <strong>Results</strong> All three versions were significantly correlated with parental- and child-related variables. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the best model fit for the 10-item version, and configural and partial metric invariance across countries could be established for this version. Item response theory analyses also supported this measure.<br><br> <strong>Conclusions</strong> Our findings show that the 10-item version performed better than the 13-item version and the original PS both overall and on the country level. Reliability values were somewhat lower than reported in studies from the United States.<br><br> <strong>Implications</strong> The 10-item version constitutes a promising short measure for assessing dysfunctional parenting in European middle-income countries for researchers and practitioners.<p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:53:29Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c28c91a3-09b7-41e9-99b2-ca897d1297d9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:53:29Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c28c91a3-09b7-41e9-99b2-ca897d1297d92023-08-03T14:06:31ZMeasuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting ScaleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c28c91a3-09b7-41e9-99b2-ca897d1297d9EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2022Prandstetter, KWaller, FHeinrichs, NHutchings, JWard, CLDanila, ILachman, JMForan, HM<p><strong>Objective</strong> This study assessed the psychometric properties of three versions of the Parenting Scale (PS; original PS, 13-item version, and 10-item version) in three European middle-income countries.<br><br> <strong>Background</strong> The PS is one of the most frequently used questionnaires for measuring dysfunctional discipline strategies. Although its validity has been extensively investigated in American samples, there are mixed results regarding the recommended number of items and subscales, raising the question of replicability across European middle-income countries.<br><br> <strong>Method</strong> Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) and item response theory (IRT) were applied to <em>N</em> = 835 parents from North Macedonia, Moldova, and Romania.<br><br> <strong>Results</strong> All three versions were significantly correlated with parental- and child-related variables. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the best model fit for the 10-item version, and configural and partial metric invariance across countries could be established for this version. Item response theory analyses also supported this measure.<br><br> <strong>Conclusions</strong> Our findings show that the 10-item version performed better than the 13-item version and the original PS both overall and on the country level. Reliability values were somewhat lower than reported in studies from the United States.<br><br> <strong>Implications</strong> The 10-item version constitutes a promising short measure for assessing dysfunctional parenting in European middle-income countries for researchers and practitioners.<p>
spellingShingle Prandstetter, K
Waller, F
Heinrichs, N
Hutchings, J
Ward, CL
Danila, I
Lachman, JM
Foran, HM
Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title_full Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title_fullStr Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title_full_unstemmed Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title_short Measuring dysfunctional parenting: psychometrics of three versions of the Parenting Scale
title_sort measuring dysfunctional parenting psychometrics of three versions of the parenting scale
work_keys_str_mv AT prandstetterk measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT wallerf measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT heinrichsn measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT hutchingsj measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT wardcl measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT danilai measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT lachmanjm measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale
AT foranhm measuringdysfunctionalparentingpsychometricsofthreeversionsoftheparentingscale