| Summary: | The main aim of this paper is to highlight that, when dealing with DG methods for linear hyperbolic equations or advection-dominated equations, it is much more convenient to write the upwind numerical flux as the sum of the usual (symmetric) average and a jump penalty. The equivalence of the two ways of writing is certainly well known (see e.g. Ref. 4); yet, it is very widespread not to consider upwinding, for DG methods, as a stabilization procedure, and too often in the literature the upwind form is preferred in proofs. Here, we wish to underline the fact that the combined use of the formalism of Ref. 3 and the jump formulation of upwind terms has several advantages. One of them is, in general, to provide a simpler and more elegant way of proving stability. The second advantage is that the calibration of the penalty parameter to be used in the jump term is left to the user (who can think of taking advantage of this added freedom), and the third is that, if a diffusive term is present, the two jump stabilizations (for the generalized upwinding and for the DG treatment of the diffusive term) are often of identical or very similar form, and this can also be turned to the user's advantage.
|
|---|