Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges

Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges

BACKGROUND:The need for better methods for evaluation in health research has been widely recognised. The 'complexity turn' has drawn attention to the limitations of relying on causal inference from randomised controlled trials alone for understanding whether, and under which conditions, in...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính:	Paparini, S, Green, J, Papoutsi, C, Murdoch, J, Petticrew, M, Greenhalgh, T, Hanckel, B, Shaw, S
Định dạng:	Journal article
Ngôn ngữ:	English
Được phát hành:	BioMed Central 2020

Những quyển sách tương tự

Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges
Bằng: Sara Paparini, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020-11-01)

TRIPLE C reporting principles for case study evaluations of the role of context in complex interventions
Bằng: Shaw, SE, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Evaluating complex interventions in context: systematic, meta-narrative review of case study approaches
Bằng: Paparini, S, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

TRIPLE C reporting principles for case study evaluations of the role of context in complex interventions
Bằng: Sara E. Shaw, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023-05-01)

Mobilising context as complex and dynamic in evaluations of complex health interventions
Bằng: Murdoch, J, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Case study research and causal inference
Bằng: Green, J, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022)

Mobilising context as complex and dynamic in evaluations of complex health interventions
Bằng: Jamie Murdoch, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023-12-01)

Case study research and causal inference
Bằng: Judith Green, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022-12-01)

The use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to address causality in complex systems: a systematic review of research on public health interventions
Bằng: Benjamin Hanckel, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021-05-01)

We need to talk about complexity in health research: findings from a focused ethnography
Bằng: Papoutsi, C, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020)

Protocol for a systematic review of the use of qualitative comparative analysis for evaluative questions in public health research
Bằng: Benjamin Hanckel, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019-11-01)

Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Ethical rationale for better coordination of clinical research on COVID-19
Bằng: Francois Bompart
Được phát hành: (2020-07-01)

Putting the social back into sociotechnical: case studies of co-design in digital health.
Bằng: Papoutsi, C, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020)

Explaining the UK's 'high-risk' approach to type 2 diabetes prevention: findings from a qualitative interview study with policy-makers in England
Bằng: Barry, E, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Infrastructure revisited: an ethnographic case study of how health information infrastructure shapes and constrains technological innovation
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019)

Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2017)

Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Spread, scale-up, and sustainability of video consulting in health care: Systematic Review and synthesis guided by the NASSS framework
Bằng: James, HM, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

Books: Evaluative research methods. Managing the complexities of judgment in the field: Evaluation for Social Justice
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T
Được phát hành: (2017)

Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement
Bằng: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019)

Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care.
Bằng: Plsek, P, et al.
Được phát hành: (2001)

Explaining the UK’s ‘high-risk’ approach to type 2 diabetes prevention: findings from a qualitative interview study with policy-makers in England
Bằng: Trisha Greenhalgh, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023-02-01)

Theorising support for interdisciplinary early-career researchers using communicative genre and ‘rules of the game’
Bằng: Meier, N, et al.
Được phát hành: (2024)

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions.
Bằng: Noyes, J, et al.
Được phát hành: (2013)

A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions
Bằng: Noyes, J, et al.
Được phát hành: (2013)

Rationale and design of the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS)
Bằng: Bethel, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2009)

Supporting your support staff during crises: recommendations for practice leaders to develop a relational workplace
Bằng: Dakin, F, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

The Daily Mile as a public health intervention: a rapid ethnographic assessment of uptake and implementation in South London, UK
Bằng: Benjamin Hanckel, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019-08-01)

Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol
Bằng: Pierfrancesco Agostoni, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020-07-01)

Privatisation in Malaysia : rationale, practice and challenges /
Bằng: Rugayah Mohamed 361762
Được phát hành: (199-)

Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods
Bằng: Jörg Müller, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019-05-01)

The rationale for complexity thinking and emergentist systemism
Bằng: Wolfgang Hofkirchner
Được phát hành: (2017-06-01)

An Innovative Biomedical Research Training Model: Rationale, Design, and Evaluation
Bằng: Payam Sheikhattari, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022-11-01)

Psychosocial Interventions in Bipolar Disorders: Rationale and Effectiveness
Bằng: Miklowitz, D
Được phát hành: (2006)

Getting inside acupuncture trials - Exploring intervention theory and rationale
Bằng: Godfrey Mary, et al.
Được phát hành: (2011-03-01)

Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework
Bằng: Trisha Greenhalgh, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018-05-01)

Transparency of agriculture companies: rationale of responsible investment for better decision making under sustainability
Bằng: Inna Makarenko, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022-06-01)

Smart Warehouses: Rationale, Challenges and Solution Directions
Bằng: Maarten van Geest, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021-12-01)

Optimizing the development and evaluation of complex interventions: lessons learned from the BetterBirth Program and associated trial
Bằng: Dale A. Barnhart, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020-02-01)