The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

We examined the effects of modality expectancy on human performance. Participants judged azimuth (left vs. right location) for an unpredictable sequence of auditory, visual, and tactile targets. In some blocks, equal numbers of targets were presented in each modality. In others, the majority (75%) o...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори: Spence, C, Nicholls, M, Driver, J
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: 2001
_version_ 1826295156530216960
author Spence, C
Nicholls, M
Driver, J
author_facet Spence, C
Nicholls, M
Driver, J
author_sort Spence, C
collection OXFORD
description We examined the effects of modality expectancy on human performance. Participants judged azimuth (left vs. right location) for an unpredictable sequence of auditory, visual, and tactile targets. In some blocks, equal numbers of targets were presented in each modality. In others, the majority (75%) of the targets were presented in just one expected modality. Reaction times (RTs) for targets in an unexpected modality were slower than when that modality was expected or when no expectancy applied. RT costs associated with shifting attention from the tactile modality were greater than those for shifts from either audition or vision. Any RT benefits for the most likely modality were due to priming from an event in the same modality on the previous trial, not to the expectancy per se. These results show that stimulus-driven and expectancy-driven effects must be distinguished in studies of attending to different sensory modalities.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:56:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c31f7a51-740e-40a2-8424-9b0fc17d7045
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:56:43Z
publishDate 2001
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c31f7a51-740e-40a2-8424-9b0fc17d70452022-03-27T06:14:08ZThe cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c31f7a51-740e-40a2-8424-9b0fc17d7045EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2001Spence, CNicholls, MDriver, JWe examined the effects of modality expectancy on human performance. Participants judged azimuth (left vs. right location) for an unpredictable sequence of auditory, visual, and tactile targets. In some blocks, equal numbers of targets were presented in each modality. In others, the majority (75%) of the targets were presented in just one expected modality. Reaction times (RTs) for targets in an unexpected modality were slower than when that modality was expected or when no expectancy applied. RT costs associated with shifting attention from the tactile modality were greater than those for shifts from either audition or vision. Any RT benefits for the most likely modality were due to priming from an event in the same modality on the previous trial, not to the expectancy per se. These results show that stimulus-driven and expectancy-driven effects must be distinguished in studies of attending to different sensory modalities.
spellingShingle Spence, C
Nicholls, M
Driver, J
The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title_full The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title_fullStr The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title_full_unstemmed The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title_short The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.
title_sort cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality
work_keys_str_mv AT spencec thecostofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality
AT nichollsm thecostofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality
AT driverj thecostofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality
AT spencec costofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality
AT nichollsm costofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality
AT driverj costofexpectingeventsinthewrongsensorymodality