Assessing the quality of research.

Assessing the quality of research.

Show other versions (1)

Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Glasziou, P, Vandenbroucke, J, Chalmers, I
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2004

Similar Items

Assessing the quality of research
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2004)

Erratum: Assessing the quality of research (British Medical Journal (2004) 328 (39-41))
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2004)

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.
by: Chalmers, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.
by: Chalmers, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2004)

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?
by: Bastian, H, et al.
Published: (2010)

<it>Current Controlled Trials</it>: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
by: Chalmers Iain
Published: (2000-08-01)

The importance of prognostic research.
by: Glasziou, P
Published: (2002)

When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2007)

When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2007)

Re: "quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research".
by: von Elm, E, et al.
Published: (2005)

Re: "Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research"
by: von Elm, E, et al.
Published: (2005)

Focus on sharing individual patient data distracts from other ways of improving trial transparency.
by: Hoffmann, T, et al.
Published: (2017)

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?
by: Hilda Bastian, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01)

GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.
by: Schünemann, H, et al.
Published: (2008)

GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.
by: Schünemann, H, et al.
Published: (2008)

If I could set the medical research agenda for the next 10 years ...
by: Glasziou, P
Published: (2008)

When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise Paul Glasziou and colleagues
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2007)

Health technology assessment: an evidence-based medicine perspective.
by: Glasziou, P
Published: (2012)

Intervention synthesis: a missing link between a systematic review and practical treatment(s).
by: Paul P Glasziou, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01)

Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science.
by: Jan P Vandenbroucke
Published: (2008-03-01)

The EBM journal selection process: how to find the 1 in 400 valid and highly relevant new research articles.
by: Glasziou, P
Published: (2006)

The paths from research to improved health outcomes.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2005)

Epley and the slow boat from research to practice.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2008)

The paths from research to improved health outcomes.
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2005)

The paths from research to improved health outcomes
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2005)

The role of open access in reducing waste in medical research.
by: Paul Glasziou
Published: (2014-05-01)

Interpreting research findings to guide treatment in practice
by: Kendrick, T, et al.
Published: (2009)

Interpreting research findings to guide treatment in practice.
by: Kendrick, T, et al.
Published: (2008)

Event rates, hospital utilization, and costs associated with major complications of diabetes: a multicountry comparative analysis.
by: Clarke, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: insights from healthcare research
by: Isaacs, T, et al.
Published: (2023)

The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.
by: David Moher, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
by: Schroter, S, et al.
Published: (2012)

Comparability of patient-reported health status: multicountry analysis of EQ-5D responses in patients with type 2 diabetes.
by: Salomon, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Clinicians also need training in use of research evidence.
by: Gilbert, R, et al.
Published: (2008)

Can evidence-based medicine and clinical quality improvement learn from each other?
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
by: Savulescu, J, et al.
Published: (1996)

Does setting good practice standards for research ethics committees increase their legal liability?
by: Savulescu, J, et al.
Published: (1997)

Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.
by: Bossuyt, P, et al.
Published: (2006)

Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways
by: Bossuyt, P, et al.
Published: (2006)