Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified several common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk. It is likely, however, that a substantial proportion of such loci have not yet been discovered. METHODS: We compared 296,114 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 169...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Fletcher, O, Johnson, N, Orr, N, Hosking, F, Gibson, L, Walker, K, Zelenika, D, Gut, I, Heath, S, Palles, C, Coupland, B, Broderick, P, Schoemaker, M, Jones, M, Williamson, J, Chilcott-Burns, S, Tomczyk, K, Simpson, G, Jacobs, K, Chanock, S, Hunter, D, Tomlinson, I, Swerdlow, A, Ashworth, A, Ross, G
বিন্যাস: Journal article
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: 2011
_version_ 1826295330941960192
author Fletcher, O
Johnson, N
Orr, N
Hosking, F
Gibson, L
Walker, K
Zelenika, D
Gut, I
Heath, S
Palles, C
Coupland, B
Broderick, P
Schoemaker, M
Jones, M
Williamson, J
Chilcott-Burns, S
Tomczyk, K
Simpson, G
Jacobs, K
Chanock, S
Hunter, D
Tomlinson, I
Swerdlow, A
Ashworth, A
Ross, G
author_facet Fletcher, O
Johnson, N
Orr, N
Hosking, F
Gibson, L
Walker, K
Zelenika, D
Gut, I
Heath, S
Palles, C
Coupland, B
Broderick, P
Schoemaker, M
Jones, M
Williamson, J
Chilcott-Burns, S
Tomczyk, K
Simpson, G
Jacobs, K
Chanock, S
Hunter, D
Tomlinson, I
Swerdlow, A
Ashworth, A
Ross, G
author_sort Fletcher, O
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified several common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk. It is likely, however, that a substantial proportion of such loci have not yet been discovered. METHODS: We compared 296,114 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 1694 breast cancer case subjects (92% with two primary cancers or at least two affected first-degree relatives) and 2365 control subjects, with validation in three independent series totaling 11,880 case subjects and 12,487 control subjects. Odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each stage and all stages combined were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran Q and I(2) statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified a novel risk locus for breast cancer at 9q31.2 (rs865686: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.92, P = 1.75 × 10(-10)). This single-nucleotide polymorphism maps to a gene desert, the nearest genes being Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4, 636 kb centromeric), RAD23 homolog B (RAD23B, 794 kb centromeric), and actin-like 7A (ACTL7A, 736 kb telomeric). We also identified two variants (rs3734805 and rs9383938) mapping to 6q25.1 estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), which were associated with breast cancer in subjects of northern European ancestry (rs3734805: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.27, P = 1.35 × 10(-7); rs9383938: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.26, P = 1.41 × 10(-7)). A variant mapping to 10q26.13, approximately 300 kb telomeric to the established risk locus within the second intron of FGFR2, was also associated with breast cancer risk, although not at genome-wide statistical significance (rs10510102: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17, P = 1.58 × 10(-6)). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence on the role of genetic variation in the etiology of breast cancer. Fine mapping will be needed to identify causal variants and to determine their functional effects.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T03:59:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c400deda-436f-4ff7-b84c-26e49225be7f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T03:59:22Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c400deda-436f-4ff7-b84c-26e49225be7f2022-03-27T06:20:32ZNovel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c400deda-436f-4ff7-b84c-26e49225be7fEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Fletcher, OJohnson, NOrr, NHosking, FGibson, LWalker, KZelenika, DGut, IHeath, SPalles, CCoupland, BBroderick, PSchoemaker, MJones, MWilliamson, JChilcott-Burns, STomczyk, KSimpson, GJacobs, KChanock, SHunter, DTomlinson, ISwerdlow, AAshworth, ARoss, G BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified several common genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk. It is likely, however, that a substantial proportion of such loci have not yet been discovered. METHODS: We compared 296,114 tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 1694 breast cancer case subjects (92% with two primary cancers or at least two affected first-degree relatives) and 2365 control subjects, with validation in three independent series totaling 11,880 case subjects and 12,487 control subjects. Odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each stage and all stages combined were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran Q and I(2) statistics. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified a novel risk locus for breast cancer at 9q31.2 (rs865686: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.92, P = 1.75 × 10(-10)). This single-nucleotide polymorphism maps to a gene desert, the nearest genes being Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4, 636 kb centromeric), RAD23 homolog B (RAD23B, 794 kb centromeric), and actin-like 7A (ACTL7A, 736 kb telomeric). We also identified two variants (rs3734805 and rs9383938) mapping to 6q25.1 estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), which were associated with breast cancer in subjects of northern European ancestry (rs3734805: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.27, P = 1.35 × 10(-7); rs9383938: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.26, P = 1.41 × 10(-7)). A variant mapping to 10q26.13, approximately 300 kb telomeric to the established risk locus within the second intron of FGFR2, was also associated with breast cancer risk, although not at genome-wide statistical significance (rs10510102: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17, P = 1.58 × 10(-6)). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence on the role of genetic variation in the etiology of breast cancer. Fine mapping will be needed to identify causal variants and to determine their functional effects.
spellingShingle Fletcher, O
Johnson, N
Orr, N
Hosking, F
Gibson, L
Walker, K
Zelenika, D
Gut, I
Heath, S
Palles, C
Coupland, B
Broderick, P
Schoemaker, M
Jones, M
Williamson, J
Chilcott-Burns, S
Tomczyk, K
Simpson, G
Jacobs, K
Chanock, S
Hunter, D
Tomlinson, I
Swerdlow, A
Ashworth, A
Ross, G
Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title_full Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title_fullStr Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title_full_unstemmed Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title_short Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study.
title_sort novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31 2 results of a genome wide association study
work_keys_str_mv AT fletchero novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT johnsonn novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT orrn novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT hoskingf novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT gibsonl novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT walkerk novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT zelenikad novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT guti novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT heaths novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT pallesc novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT couplandb novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT broderickp novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT schoemakerm novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT jonesm novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT williamsonj novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT chilcottburnss novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT tomczykk novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT simpsong novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT jacobsk novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT chanocks novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT hunterd novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT tomlinsoni novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT swerdlowa novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT ashwortha novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy
AT rossg novelbreastcancersusceptibilitylocusat9q312resultsofagenomewideassociationstudy