Classification or phylogenetic estimates?
[m]3ta is a method that seeks to implement a taxic view of homology. The method is consistent with Patterson's tests for discriminating homology from nonhomology. Contrary to the claims of Kluge and Farris, (1999, Cladistics 15, 205-212), m3ta is not a phenetic method - nor does it necessarily...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2000
|
| _version_ | 1826295337301573632 |
|---|---|
| author | Scotland, R Carine, M |
| author_facet | Scotland, R Carine, M |
| author_sort | Scotland, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | [m]3ta is a method that seeks to implement a taxic view of homology. The method is consistent with Patterson's tests for discriminating homology from nonhomology. Contrary to the claims of Kluge and Farris, (1999, Cladistics 15, 205-212), m3ta is not a phenetic method - nor does it necessarily place the basal split in a tree between the phenetically most divergent taxa. [m]3ta does not seek to accurately recover phylogeny but rather it seeks to maximize the information content of taxic homology propositions. [m]3ta is a method of classification in which the unit of analysis is the relation of homology. [m]3ta differs from all phylogenetic methods because the units of analyses in phylogenetic methods, including sca, are transformation series. © 2000 The Willi Hennig Society. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:59:28Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:c40a897d-1917-4a0c-bce1-f50d688265b6 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T03:59:28Z |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:c40a897d-1917-4a0c-bce1-f50d688265b62022-03-27T06:20:42ZClassification or phylogenetic estimates?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c40a897d-1917-4a0c-bce1-f50d688265b6EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2000Scotland, RCarine, M[m]3ta is a method that seeks to implement a taxic view of homology. The method is consistent with Patterson's tests for discriminating homology from nonhomology. Contrary to the claims of Kluge and Farris, (1999, Cladistics 15, 205-212), m3ta is not a phenetic method - nor does it necessarily place the basal split in a tree between the phenetically most divergent taxa. [m]3ta does not seek to accurately recover phylogeny but rather it seeks to maximize the information content of taxic homology propositions. [m]3ta is a method of classification in which the unit of analysis is the relation of homology. [m]3ta differs from all phylogenetic methods because the units of analyses in phylogenetic methods, including sca, are transformation series. © 2000 The Willi Hennig Society. |
| spellingShingle | Scotland, R Carine, M Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title | Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title_full | Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title_fullStr | Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title_short | Classification or phylogenetic estimates? |
| title_sort | classification or phylogenetic estimates |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT scotlandr classificationorphylogeneticestimates AT carinem classificationorphylogeneticestimates |