Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise

<strong>Background.</strong> In order to tackle the issue of physical inactivity, local governments have implemented population-level programmes to promote exercise. While evidence is accumulating on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions, studies have typically adopted a health s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Candio, FP, Meads, D, Hill, AJ, Bojke, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
_version_ 1797093949338288128
author Candio, FP
Meads, D
Hill, AJ
Bojke, L
author_facet Candio, FP
Meads, D
Hill, AJ
Bojke, L
author_sort Candio, FP
collection OXFORD
description <strong>Background.</strong> In order to tackle the issue of physical inactivity, local governments have implemented population-level programmes to promote exercise. While evidence is accumulating on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions, studies have typically adopted a health sector perspective for economic evaluation. This approach has been challenged as it does not allow for key concerns by local governments, which are primary stakeholders, to be addressed. <br> <strong>Objectives.</strong> To show how taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation can be implemented in practice and this may affect the economic conclusions. <br> <strong>Methods.</strong> Based on data from a case study, the health equity impact of the intervention and its opportunity cost from a service provider viewpoint were assessed. The cost-effectiveness implications of a change in perspective were subsequently estimated by means of scenario analysis. <br> <strong>Findings.</strong> The intervention was found to provide adult residents living in the most deprived city areas with greater health benefits compared with the rest of the population. However, a negative net equity impact was found in the short-term. The opportunity cost of the intervention was estimated to be substantially lower than its financial cost (£2.77 per person/year), with significant implications for decision-making. <br> <strong>Conclusions.</strong> Taking a local government perspective can affect the conclusions drawn from the economic evaluation of population-level programmes to promote exercise, and therefore influence decision making.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T04:07:22Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:c6a3fac8-954d-49b6-b730-dc99f84fc98f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T04:07:22Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:c6a3fac8-954d-49b6-b730-dc99f84fc98f2022-03-27T06:39:32ZTaking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exerciseJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:c6a3fac8-954d-49b6-b730-dc99f84fc98fEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2021Candio, FPMeads, DHill, AJBojke, L<strong>Background.</strong> In order to tackle the issue of physical inactivity, local governments have implemented population-level programmes to promote exercise. While evidence is accumulating on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions, studies have typically adopted a health sector perspective for economic evaluation. This approach has been challenged as it does not allow for key concerns by local governments, which are primary stakeholders, to be addressed. <br> <strong>Objectives.</strong> To show how taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation can be implemented in practice and this may affect the economic conclusions. <br> <strong>Methods.</strong> Based on data from a case study, the health equity impact of the intervention and its opportunity cost from a service provider viewpoint were assessed. The cost-effectiveness implications of a change in perspective were subsequently estimated by means of scenario analysis. <br> <strong>Findings.</strong> The intervention was found to provide adult residents living in the most deprived city areas with greater health benefits compared with the rest of the population. However, a negative net equity impact was found in the short-term. The opportunity cost of the intervention was estimated to be substantially lower than its financial cost (£2.77 per person/year), with significant implications for decision-making. <br> <strong>Conclusions.</strong> Taking a local government perspective can affect the conclusions drawn from the economic evaluation of population-level programmes to promote exercise, and therefore influence decision making.
spellingShingle Candio, FP
Meads, D
Hill, AJ
Bojke, L
Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title_full Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title_fullStr Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title_full_unstemmed Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title_short Taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population-level programme to promote exercise
title_sort taking a local government perspective for economic evaluation of a population level programme to promote exercise
work_keys_str_mv AT candiofp takingalocalgovernmentperspectiveforeconomicevaluationofapopulationlevelprogrammetopromoteexercise
AT meadsd takingalocalgovernmentperspectiveforeconomicevaluationofapopulationlevelprogrammetopromoteexercise
AT hillaj takingalocalgovernmentperspectiveforeconomicevaluationofapopulationlevelprogrammetopromoteexercise
AT bojkel takingalocalgovernmentperspectiveforeconomicevaluationofapopulationlevelprogrammetopromoteexercise